2026-01-13 03:26:02

Recently, many investors have expressed concerns about the prospects of ZEC. The core issue lies in the obvious information asymmetry between the project team and retail investors. On one hand, the project team attracts investors through publicity, while on the other hand, they choose to sell off and cash out at critical moments, leaving investors to take the fall.

This phenomenon is not uncommon in the crypto space. Once investors put their money in, the project team controls the narrative. Some openly state that as long as the funds go into their pockets, public opinion pressure becomes irrelevant.

What’s more worrying is that the risks faced by ZEC may be significant. Referring to cases like Luna’s project collapse, the downfall of high-risk projects often comes unexpectedly. This serves as a reminder to investors: in the crypto market, assessing the true fundamentals behind a project is far more important than simply trusting promises.

ZEC4,35%

LUNA-2,45%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVHunterZhang

· 7h ago

Really, ZEC is just the old trick in the crypto world, where the project team takes a profit and leaves. When Luna exploded, lessons should have been learned. Yet, people are still pouring money in. Once distrust sets in, it's basically impossible to turn back.

View OriginalReply0

unrekt.eth

· 01-13 14:04

ZEC is about to have another bagholder, same old routine Project team cashes out and runs, retail investors cry out, the eternal cycle of the crypto world Haven't learned the lesson from Luna yet, and still dare to go all in? Trusting promises is not as good as looking at fundamentals, but unfortunately most people just want to get rich overnight In an asymmetric game, we will always be that sheep

View OriginalReply0

zkNoob

· 01-13 03:53

ZEC this thing, to put it simply, is just the old routine... I've seen it too many times, project teams boast and retail investors take the bait, and as soon as the money is in hand, they run off. That Luna wave really screwed over a lot of people, and I still have lingering fears. If you're going to play with this stuff, you need to see it clearly yourself, don't be fooled by promises, especially with these opaque projects.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroEnjoyer

· 01-13 03:48

Another old script, the ZEC issue has a strong Luna déjà vu feeling --- The project team holding the narrative rights is a brilliant move, retail investors are always a step behind --- Basically, it's an eternal game between retail investors and whales, nobody can change that --- If the project team is this way, I basically don't touch privacy coins anymore --- Did you forget Luna's lesson? Still betting on this kind of thing --- Once the money goes in, it's gone. That's the truth of the crypto world --- Fundamentals? Laughable, how many projects truly have fundamentals

View OriginalReply0

LuckyBlindCat

· 01-13 03:45

Same old tricks, the crypto world’s way of cutting leeks just keeps going. I had a premonition about ZEC early on; the more the project team talks nicely, the more cautious you should be. Luna has already exploded, and people are still throwing money in, really... Basically, it’s an information gap; retail investors are always the last to take the hit. Dumping and cashing out is a slick move; by the time you react, you’re already bleeding heavily. Fundamentals? Ha, how many have actually looked into them? Most just follow the trend. This is the crypto scene—once the funds are in hand, they don’t care anymore. Public opinion pressure? Laughable. History always repeats itself; change the coin name, and it’s the same show.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterZhang

· 01-13 03:42

Haha, about ZEC, I saw it coming a long time ago. The project team takes a profit and then it's time to reinvest. --- It's the same old trick, dazzling at the entrance, but not even a heads-up when they dump. --- Is Luna still not learning? In this circle, the fundamental is just about who can run faster. --- Honestly, instead of studying whitepapers, it's better to look at the project team's wallet addresses—that's the real truth. --- Before going all-in, ask yourself: is this an investment or gambling? I guess most people can't tell the difference. --- Asymmetric interests? That's called information gap. The old-timers who make big money quietly are those who have been burned once. --- As for ZEC, I won't touch it anymore. Once burned, second time around it's like watching a scumbag. --- The biggest fundamental in the crypto world is when the project team plans to run away; everything else is just clouds.

View OriginalReply0

BuyHighSellLow

· 01-13 03:38

It's the same old trick, the project team’s classic way of scamming retail investors. Did they not learn from the Luna explosion? They are truly clueless. ZEC does have issues, but those who dared to act have already run away. Trusting promises is less reliable than trusting the K-line. Wake up, everyone. Retail investors will always be the last to know.

View OriginalReply0

TokenVelocityTrauma

· 01-13 03:37

Once again, the same old trick. ZEC is really starting to struggle this time. The project team cashes out, retail investors take the hit—same old story. When Luna exploded, I still hadn’t learned my lesson. Now it’s happening again? Honestly, it’s just an information gap; we’re always the last to know. Can we still consider ZEC? The risk feels a bit high. That’s why I only focus on fundamentals now, not stories. No matter how good the pitch, if the money’s gone, it’s useless. Another plan to create bagholders? That’s just how the crypto world works—money goes in and people disappear. I wish I hadn’t touched privacy coins; there are too many issues. Who still dares to buy ZEC? This move is really a bit outrageous.

View OriginalReply0