Is Ethereum still worth holding in 2026? Recently, I’ve seen some calm voices in the community, and I think it’s necessary to sort things out clearly.
Don’t rush to criticize; first, listen to the logic. I’ve been involved in this market for a few years now, and I want to honestly lay out some observations. Many people are still living in the 2021 narrative, but the ecosystem has long since changed.
**How serious is the "betrayal" of Layer 2?**
Initially, everyone agreed to prosper together, but Layer 2 projects (like Arbitrum, Base) have gone their own way. They’ve taken away transaction traffic and earned Gas fee revenues, while the mainnet’s destruction mechanism isn’t as strong as imagined. Conversely, ETH’s inflation pressure remains, but its value capture ability is weakening. The mainnet is like an emptied-out infrastructure, mainly collecting basic fees without many economic model advantages.
**The experience gap is obvious**
It’s 2026 now, and parallel EVM chains like Solana and Monad are incredibly fast, with smooth operation comparable to Web2 applications. In contrast, Ethereum’s cross-chain bridges, multi-layer protocols, and complex interaction processes… Will users really endure these for the sake of "decentralization ideals"? High cross-chain risks and minutes-long confirmation times are unacceptable for ordinary users.
**Institutional money is already shifting**
Don’t expect the next bull market. Institutional capital has long been seeking new directions—such as the AI+Crypto integration track, native high-performance public chains—these areas have much stronger explosive potential. Ethereum is stuck in the middle: in terms of risk hedging, it’s less stable than Bitcoin; in terms of growth elasticity, it’s not as good as emerging public chains.
**The core issue**
Ethereum has fallen into a "mediocrity trap." The once-promised "world computer" has become increasingly complex, and this complexity itself has become a burden. Market confidence is still supported to some extent by liquidity and historical inertia, but once this support loosens, a rapid price decline is not hard to imagine.
This doesn’t mean ETH will necessarily fail, but by 2026, the crypto market is no longer an era dominated solely by ETH.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CountdownToBroke
· 12h ago
Really, I have to admit this logic hits a nerve... The fact that the mainnet has been sidelined has long been felt.
No doubt, L2s are each doing their own thing and still fooling themselves.
The experience on Solana is really smooth, we have to admit.
Institutions are indeed running, and that's the most heartbreaking.
It's exposed; we still need multi-chain deployment. Going ALL IN on one is too risky.
But don't demonize it either; how low ETH can fall in the worst case is also a concern.
Anyway, I'm considering reducing my position. What do you all think?
This article hit a recent pain point for me...
Honestly, emotional attachment can't support the price; if you need to cut, just cut.
Wait, what about BTC? At least it's still stable?
View OriginalReply0
token_therapist
· 21h ago
Hmm... That hits hard, but I've long seen through the L2 traffic grab. The mainnet turning into a fee collector for infrastructure is indeed quite ironic.
---
Wait, are institutions really diverting traffic? Or are we retail investors just scaring ourselves?
---
The mediocrity trap is spot on. The once king is now just an intermediary, so hopeless.
---
But to be fair, I still need to hold some ETH, just as insurance. Anyway, I can't afford to go all-in on new public chains.
---
Cross-chain bridges are really annoying. One transaction fee can wipe out half your life savings. That experience definitely loses to Sol in many ways.
---
Who will win in 2026 is really uncertain, but the author's logic is so tight that I have to admit defeat.
---
Historical inertia is holding up... This sentence hit home. It feels like waiting for the sound of the bubble bursting one day.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e19e9c10
· 21h ago
Listen, to be honest, I've seen through this L2 thing long ago. The mainnet feels like it's been drained. However, I still think short ETH is a bit too absolute, after all, the ecosystem foundation is still there.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPhantom
· 21h ago
Short-selling comments, the division of L2 has been decided long ago, but do you really think ETH will die? Dream on.
---
The mediocre trap is a bit overdone, but institutions are indeed fleeing, and that hits the point.
---
Wait, are you talking about holding or selling? It's a bit confusing.
---
Solana is fast, but what about security? Is such a simple comparison interesting?
---
It sounds like you're endorsing a new public chain. Is there a conflict of interest?
---
Anyway, I don't plan to sell. If it drops, it becomes cheaper. I still believe in ETH's fundamentals for the long term.
---
The mainnet Gas fees have indeed been gouged, and that logic holds up.
---
Historical inertia is also a force. You make it sound as fragile as paper, which is a bit exaggerated.
---
Someone said the same a year ago, and look what happened—it's still bullish.
---
"L2 betrayal"? Come on, that's just Ethereum's scaling solution. Why has it been elevated to the level of betrayal?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedTwice
· 21h ago
I’ve listened... Bro, your logic really hits the nail on the head, but I still think you underestimate ETH’s resilience.
L2 sharding is a fact, but the true value still resides on the mainnet. These two are not contradictory. The gas fees earned by Arbitrum and Base are nothing compared to Ethereum’s role as a settlement layer.
I agree that cross-chain experience is poor, but what does Solana and Monad compare to? One has no real application ecosystem, and the other has no online presence at all. No matter how impressive the hype, someone has to use it.
I agree with institutional sharding, but don’t forget, institutions thrive on swings; switching hotspots is routine. When the next cycle comes, funds will probably return to the fundamentals... That’s just a possibility.
The mediocrity trap is a perfect term, it hits hard. But the inertia of history is especially useful in the crypto market. You say liquidity loosening... maybe, but when?
Anyway, I haven’t sold yet. Only when I’m dead will it be a real loss.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 21h ago
Hmm… This logic sounds like it's sentencing ETH to death, but I can't completely deny it either.
Solana's speed is fast, but do users really migrate just for speed? The inertia of holding positions is incredibly powerful.
It's indeed painful that L2s are taking gas fees, but the mainnet should be developing towards the settlement layer… Why try to do everything?
I understand the awkwardness of the middle ground, but the skeptics are still betting on the next cycle.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxOpener
· 21h ago
Wake up, L2 has already sold the mainnet
---
Solana is really getting ridiculous, I’m still waiting for ETH confirmation...
---
Institutions' money has all moved to the AI chain, who’s still clinging to ETH
---
The mediocrity trap is so true, that’s exactly how it feels
---
The so-called "decentralized sentiment" that no one buys into, is not as good as just wanting speed
---
Mainnet becoming infrastructure? That’s a bit heartbreaking, buddy
---
In the next bull market, look at new public chains; ETH is already a thing of the past
---
Liquidity and historical inertia won’t last long, loosening is inevitable
Is Ethereum still worth holding in 2026? Recently, I’ve seen some calm voices in the community, and I think it’s necessary to sort things out clearly.
Don’t rush to criticize; first, listen to the logic. I’ve been involved in this market for a few years now, and I want to honestly lay out some observations. Many people are still living in the 2021 narrative, but the ecosystem has long since changed.
**How serious is the "betrayal" of Layer 2?**
Initially, everyone agreed to prosper together, but Layer 2 projects (like Arbitrum, Base) have gone their own way. They’ve taken away transaction traffic and earned Gas fee revenues, while the mainnet’s destruction mechanism isn’t as strong as imagined. Conversely, ETH’s inflation pressure remains, but its value capture ability is weakening. The mainnet is like an emptied-out infrastructure, mainly collecting basic fees without many economic model advantages.
**The experience gap is obvious**
It’s 2026 now, and parallel EVM chains like Solana and Monad are incredibly fast, with smooth operation comparable to Web2 applications. In contrast, Ethereum’s cross-chain bridges, multi-layer protocols, and complex interaction processes… Will users really endure these for the sake of "decentralization ideals"? High cross-chain risks and minutes-long confirmation times are unacceptable for ordinary users.
**Institutional money is already shifting**
Don’t expect the next bull market. Institutional capital has long been seeking new directions—such as the AI+Crypto integration track, native high-performance public chains—these areas have much stronger explosive potential. Ethereum is stuck in the middle: in terms of risk hedging, it’s less stable than Bitcoin; in terms of growth elasticity, it’s not as good as emerging public chains.
**The core issue**
Ethereum has fallen into a "mediocrity trap." The once-promised "world computer" has become increasingly complex, and this complexity itself has become a burden. Market confidence is still supported to some extent by liquidity and historical inertia, but once this support loosens, a rapid price decline is not hard to imagine.
This doesn’t mean ETH will necessarily fail, but by 2026, the crypto market is no longer an era dominated solely by ETH.