Why the CIA-Bitcoin theory persists: arguments that refute it

The question of Bitcoin’s origin regularly comes back into discussion: Did the CIA orchestrate its creation? Max Keiser, a prominent figure in the pro-Bitcoin movement, quickly dismantles this conspiracy theory point by point.

Open-source as Irrefutable Evidence

Max Keiser bases his refutation on a fundamental argument: Bitcoin’s open-source architecture. Unlike a government project, Bitcoin’s source code is public, auditable, and verifiable by any developer. If a government agency had truly designed the protocol, having a backdoor or cryptographic weakness would have been quickly identified by the global security research community.

Satoshi Nakamoto’s Stylistic Signature

Beyond the code, Max Keiser emphasizes the importance of Satoshi Nakamoto’s distinctive writing style. Whitepapers, forum messages, and technical correspondence reveal a unique personality difficult to attribute to a bureaucratic institution. Government agencies rarely produce work with such intellectual coherence and clear philosophical vision.

Technical Details That Contradict the Theory

Richard Heart, another respected figure in the crypto ecosystem, adds an extra layer to this debate by pointing out Bitcoin’s use of the elliptic curve secp256k1. This technical choice deliberately diverges from preferred American cryptographic standards. Why would an American agency adopt an approach that conflicts with its own standards?

Why the Theory Still Persists

Despite these solid arguments, political commentator Tucker Carlson continues to defend this theory. His insistence is explained by a broader mistrust of centralized structures and government secrecy. This phenomenon reveals less a hidden truth than a legitimate anxiety about potential abuses of power.

Max Keiser and his allies are not saying that we should naively accept everything the government says, but rather that the available evidence formally contradicts the hypothesis of CIA involvement in Bitcoin’s creation.