2026-01-13 15:21:33

BONK's positioning is quite interesting — it's not just a Meme coin, but a blend of Utility and traditional financial elements. In simple terms, it relies on three moat strategies to lock in value.

In terms of infrastructure, BONK fun serves as the exclusive launch platform, with 51% of its revenue directly flowing back into the treasury, which is key to sustainable growth. The trading layer is even more aggressive — transaction fees generated by tools like BONKbot, Trade, and Swap are all used to buy back and burn BONK, achieving continuous deflation.

What’s fascinating is the value flywheel: more product users → increased trading volume → greater buyback and burn efforts → reduced circulating supply → rising token price and value → more holders and optimism. This logical cycle is self-reinforcing, accelerating as it spins.

On the compliance front, there’s no slack. The treasury (BNKK DAT) is managed through Bonk, Inc., and ETP products are launched on the Swiss Stock Exchange, with OTCQX trust products available in the US, directly opening the door for institutional funds. As a result, BONK is no longer just a mascot but a truly cash-flowing, asset-backed ecosystem project.

BONK7,67%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OldLeekConfession

· 20h ago

51% returns to the treasury, full buyback and burn. This logic is indeed fierce. But what really excites me is that flywheel—the faster it spins, the more the holders earn.

View OriginalReply0

MidsommarWallet

· 20h ago

Damn, BONK's recent moves are really aggressive. Turning meme coins into a financial ecosystem with a buyback and burn closed-loop design is brilliant. But on the other hand, this kind of flywheel logic sounds great, how many can actually stick with it? Compliance + institutional channels have indeed upgraded the level; it's no longer a wild meme. Wait, can the 51% return to the treasury really be sustained long-term? Won't it change midway? It really depends on whether there is genuine trading volume to support the scene. Talking about the flywheel is easy, maintaining it is hard. Honestly, I still believe in this approach; at least it's not a project that just blows smoke. If BONK can truly reach the institutional level, the Solana ecosystem will have another play. But don't underestimate the risks; this kind of self-reinforcing logic can also reverse quickly.

View OriginalReply0

GmGmNoGn

· 20h ago

Wow, I finally understand the buyback and burn closed-loop system. The more it's used, the less there is, and the less there is, the more expensive it becomes—self-fulfilling prophecy.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCross-TalkClub

· 20h ago

Laughing to death, no matter how fast this flywheel spins, it can't outpace my losing speed. --- Moats, deflation, institutional funds... they sound so much like new ways to cut leeks. --- So it's just packaging Meme coins as institutional-grade projects; I give this marketing a full score. --- Buyback and burn sounds appealing, but when it’s time to dump, why don’t I see this logic self-reinforcing? --- Swiss exchanges, US trusts... they make me feel like I’m watching Goldman Sachs’ earnings report, but it’s still the same old crypto circle. --- If this value flywheel is really so awesome, why bother explaining? Just use candlestick charts to speak for itself. --- Playing the compliance card very well, but I’m just worried that one day policies will change dramatically. --- Alright everyone, I’ve found the next "ecosystem project." Better get your wallets ready.

View OriginalReply0

ForkItAll

· 20h ago

Buyback and burn is easy to talk about but hard to do --- This flywheel logic sounds great, but can it truly reinforce itself? It still depends on whether trading volume can be maintained --- The compliance approach is well executed, but will institutional funds really buy in... --- A 51% return to the treasury sounds good, but the question is who will oversee how this money is spent --- From meme coins to ecosystem projects, this transformation does have some substance --- I've seen many deflationary designs, but the key is how long user activity can be sustained --- Adding OTCQX to Swiss exchanges does give a more formal vibe --- The value flywheel sounds good, but who will trigger the first wave of trading volume in the early stages? --- Is the treasury management transparent? Or is it as opaque as other projects --- It feels like BONK is taking a path between meme and genuine projects

View OriginalReply0