Regarding ANAGO's new issuance plan, a question worth considering is: since a token with the same name already exists, what is the significance of restarting it? Many people believe that airdrops and initial incentives can quickly attract popularity, but this approach is actually limited in effectiveness during the early stages when the ecosystem is not mature enough. The formation of community culture and user stickiness is more a result of natural market selection. Relying solely on airdrop subsidies to attract attention is already difficult to achieve in today's highly competitive environment. True community enthusiasm often comes from the recognition of the project's inherent value, rather than initial marketing hype.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DefiVeteran
· 8h ago
Airdrop tricks have long been played out, still expecting to boost popularity with subsidies?
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirrel
· 8h ago
Is this "restart" routine again? Can airdrops save the world?
---
Having the same-named tokens already, why bother messing around here? What do you really want?
---
Honestly, the airdrop approach has been outdated for a long time. Playing with it now is really a bit hopeless.
---
Value recognition vs. marketing hype, there's no fault in that. It all depends on whether ANAGO can really deliver something.
---
Releasing an immature ecosystem forcibly, that's a significant risk.
---
Community buzz can't really be manufactured; still, trying won't hurt.
---
Relying on early incentives to attract popularity now shows a lack of market understanding.
---
Basically, there's no real use case; those attracted by airdrops are just opportunists.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityWorker
· 8h ago
Airdrop tricks have been played out long ago. Do you really need to rely on this to attract value?
View OriginalReply0
BrokenRugs
· 8h ago
Rebooting a token with the same name? Isn't that just a different way of telling the same story? Airdrops have long been outdated, haha.
View OriginalReply0
PositionPhobia
· 8h ago
Airdrops are outdated; truly valuable projects don't need to go through such hassle.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinArbitrageur
· 8h ago
Is it another rebrand to start over? The same-named tokens have already gone through a round, so what makes this time different?
What problems can airdrops solve? The ecosystem itself has no substance.
Basically, it's just luck. Early entrants make money, while most retail investors end up losing.
This old trick worked in 2021. But now? Wake up, everyone.
Regarding ANAGO's new issuance plan, a question worth considering is: since a token with the same name already exists, what is the significance of restarting it? Many people believe that airdrops and initial incentives can quickly attract popularity, but this approach is actually limited in effectiveness during the early stages when the ecosystem is not mature enough. The formation of community culture and user stickiness is more a result of natural market selection. Relying solely on airdrop subsidies to attract attention is already difficult to achieve in today's highly competitive environment. True community enthusiasm often comes from the recognition of the project's inherent value, rather than initial marketing hype.