If retail investors organize and form an alliance, with a combined shareholding exceeding 51%, can they secure a seat on the board of a major exchange? It sounds like a promising governance experiment😄 This actually reflects an interesting question: between centralized exchanges and decentralized governance, do retail investors truly have a voice? If decisions could be changed solely through alliances, many controversial decisions might have already been overturned. But from another perspective, this idea itself demonstrates the Web3 era's expectation for a reallocation of power.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
VibesOverCharts
· 14h ago
Uh, retail investors' alliance holding 51% to take over the board? That sounds ridiculous. Those big capital players have already started acting.
View OriginalReply0
just_vibin_onchain
· 14h ago
Haha, retail investors' alliance taking 51% and thinking they can join the board? That idea is really naive. The exchange folks probably already have a backup plan in place.
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDream
· 14h ago
Want to join the board with just 51%? That's funny. Exchanges already have anti-dilution clauses in place.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 14h ago
51% sounds cute until you realize the real alchemy happens in the dark pools anyway... retail coordination is just theater when whales already got the seats locked down ngl
Reply0
BoredRiceBall
· 14h ago
The 51% figure sounds impressive, but can retail investors really band together? I'm skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
ExpectationFarmer
· 14h ago
51% sounds easy, but in reality, retail investors can't unite to operate it. They've already split up, haha.
If retail investors organize and form an alliance, with a combined shareholding exceeding 51%, can they secure a seat on the board of a major exchange? It sounds like a promising governance experiment😄 This actually reflects an interesting question: between centralized exchanges and decentralized governance, do retail investors truly have a voice? If decisions could be changed solely through alliances, many controversial decisions might have already been overturned. But from another perspective, this idea itself demonstrates the Web3 era's expectation for a reallocation of power.