On the surface, these types of AI verification projects may seem to lack quick hype points. But the underlying issues are sharp enough: when artificial intelligence starts making decisions for us, how can we ensure it doesn't make mistakes or cheat?



One project has a straightforward idea — abandon trust mechanisms and turn to verifiable proofs. Their approach is to write the AI's reasoning process into the blockchain, then use zero-knowledge proof technology to lock in each step of the computation. This is not for show, but to make every decision of the AI traceable and verifiable.

In other words, instead of letting users blindly trust that AI is honest, it's better to let mathematics and cryptography guarantee it. This approach touches on the most core trust issues in AI deployment.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NftDeepBreathervip
· 13h ago
Oh, this is the right way. Mathematics doesn't lie. --- Zero-knowledge proofs lock every step? That's impressive. Finally, someone is taking this seriously. --- Trust cryptography rather than black-box AI. I love hearing that. --- It feels like making AI's decision process transparent. No more shooting in the dark. --- Wait, if this really gets implemented, what will happen to those AI projects with hidden agendas? --- Verifiability is an infrastructure-level requirement. It should have been done a long time ago. --- From trust to proof, Web3 finally has some substantial applications. --- Brilliant! Replacing confidence with mathematics. I just want to see who still dares to cheat. --- This is true problem-solving, not just another hype cycle. --- On-chain AI decision-making. Thinking about it is truly stimulating.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurkervip
· 13h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound promising, but how many are actually practical? It feels like another round of hype around concepts. Backed by mathematics and cryptography, I like this idea much more than empty trust promises. By the way, how efficient is this? Verifying all processes on the blockchain would cost a fortune in gas fees. AI making decisions for people is inherently scary, but at least some people are thinking about how to regulate it—that's the real issue. Verifiable ≠ Trustworthy. Don't be fooled by marketing; the devil is in the details. Finally, someone is taking this issue seriously, but do ordinary users really care about mathematical guarantees?
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusBotvip
· 13h ago
I love the idea of mathematical guarantees; it's a hundred times more trustworthy than the phrase "we will be disciplined," which I trust the least... Can the set of zero-knowledge proofs really open up the black box of AI decision-making?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBardvip
· 13h ago
Bro, this idea is brilliant, way more reliable than any trust mechanism by a hundred times.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)