In the Bitcoin trend forecast, the institutions are at odds. Some are firmly bullish for 2026, while others warn of potential corrections. The core issue is actually quite simple—does the traditional four-year halving cycle still hold?
Let's first look at the optimistic voices. Citibank's prediction is the most aggressive: a baseline target of $143,000, with a bullish scenario potentially reaching $189,000. Standard Chartered and Bernstein are not to be outdone, both pointing to the $150,000 threshold. What about the consensus among other market institutions? It mainly falls within the $120,000 to $170,000 range. If macro conditions are strong enough and institutional funds continue to flow in, it could even reach $250,000.
But the story gets more complicated from here. Fidelity's macro research director poured cold water on the optimism, believing that the current cycle has already peaked, and 2026 is just a "rest year." Their bottom support expectations are in the $65,000 to $75,000 range. Gemini's institutional business head offers a different perspective—market maturation may lead to decreased volatility, and the return expectations for 2026 might not be as enticing.
Both bullish and bearish views have their merits; the question is, which one do you believe?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainHolmes
· 01-14 19:51
Citigroup is still dreaming, $250k? Wake up, buddy.
Halving cycles are full of crap; this time is different.
Fidelity's words sound more reasonable; I tend to believe them.
When institutions fight, we just watch the tiger fight from the mountain, buy the dip when it falls, and sell when it rises.
$65k bottom? That's pretty harsh, but it can be defended.
If it really hits $150k this time, I'll laugh; reality often proves us wrong.
Honestly, investing in Bitcoin is a game of information asymmetry; whoever has more certainty wins.
Do the bears know something we don't?
The cycle theory has long been invalid after large institutional entry.
The bull market scenario is like weather forecasts, all smoke and mirrors.
Both sides have logical flaws, but I still agree with Fidelity's cautious attitude.
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorer
· 01-14 14:31
Citibank dares to say 250,000, but Fidelity claims it will drop to 65k, this is just outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFan
· 01-13 17:55
Citibank and Fidelity have such a big difference in their statements, who would dare to bet everything?
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 01-13 17:48
Citibank says $189k, Fidelity says $65k, the gap... I choose to just relax and do nothing.
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardian
· 01-13 17:46
Citibank wants to hit $189k? Haha, forget it. Fidelity's guy is right; we've seen the top already.
Institutions are indeed calling each other out in this wave. Anyway, I don't believe anything; blindly buying the dip is the real truth.
From $65k to $250k? That's such a huge range it could even stop a plane. Whoever guesses right is a god.
Halving cycles still work? Laughing to death. This market has long lost the ability to understand patterns.
Instead of listening to these people argue, it's better to figure it out yourself. In the end, it's all about blood profits and blood losses.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 01-13 17:38
Institutions are turning into fortune-tellers one by one, daring to shout out 250k? I just want to know who the hell can accurately grasp the macro conditions.
In the Bitcoin trend forecast, the institutions are at odds. Some are firmly bullish for 2026, while others warn of potential corrections. The core issue is actually quite simple—does the traditional four-year halving cycle still hold?
Let's first look at the optimistic voices. Citibank's prediction is the most aggressive: a baseline target of $143,000, with a bullish scenario potentially reaching $189,000. Standard Chartered and Bernstein are not to be outdone, both pointing to the $150,000 threshold. What about the consensus among other market institutions? It mainly falls within the $120,000 to $170,000 range. If macro conditions are strong enough and institutional funds continue to flow in, it could even reach $250,000.
But the story gets more complicated from here. Fidelity's macro research director poured cold water on the optimism, believing that the current cycle has already peaked, and 2026 is just a "rest year." Their bottom support expectations are in the $65,000 to $75,000 range. Gemini's institutional business head offers a different perspective—market maturation may lead to decreased volatility, and the return expectations for 2026 might not be as enticing.
Both bullish and bearish views have their merits; the question is, which one do you believe?