Whale uses 25x leverage to go long on 93 BTC, revealing an aggressive trading style

ForkMonger · 2026-01-15T06:28:16+00:00

An active whale on January 15th went long on 93.08 BTC with 25x leverage, investing approximately $8.98 million, currently with a floating profit of $10,000. Its frequent opening and closing positions and high leverage approach demonstrate a aggressive trading style.

ForkMonger

2026-01-15 06:28:16

Abstract generation in progress

【Blockchain Rhythm】An interesting trading signal has appeared—a certain active whale made a big move on January 15th, just an hour ago going long with 25x leverage on 93.08 BTC, equivalent to $8.98 million. The average entry price was set at $96,391.2, and the account is now showing a unrealized profit of $10,000.

Recent activity records from this address reveal quite a few clues. Dense opening and closing of positions, consistent high leverage tactics, and a standard aggressive trading style. It’s clear that this trader is using leverage to amplify gains while also bearing the corresponding volatility. This frequency of operations and position management approach belong to the aggressive players in the market.

BTC1,98%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LayoffMiner

· 6h ago

Playing with 93 BTC at 25x leverage... This guy is really bold. A single pullback and he's getting liquidated. Floating profit is only $10,000. Playing with such a low risk-reward ratio is a bit outrageous. Being aggressive is one thing, but I'm just worried he hasn't figured out how to stop the loss. This trading frequency clearly looks like gambling, not trading. Isn't 1x leverage good enough? Why go through all this?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatorFlash

· 6h ago

25x leverage? Give me a break... The liquidation risk is completely maxed out.

View OriginalReply0

RunWhenCut

· 6h ago

Playing with 25x leverage and going so big, if you're not a gambler, you must really be confident... --- Watching this frequency of operations makes my scalp tingle, one stop-loss and it's all gone --- 93 Bitcoin with 25x leverage... buddy, are you gambling or trading? --- A floating profit of 10,000 and I want to pop champagne, but I have to wait for the close to count --- Aggressive players sound good, but in reality, they are just all-in players, it's only a matter of time --- Feeling like a liquidation with just a 2% fluctuation is hard to imagine --- This high-frequency opening and closing, most of the profit is probably eaten up by trading fees --- 8.98 million USD with 25x leverage... how strong must your mentality be? If it were me, I would have already broken down --- It's the same chasing-rally rhythm again, if BTC drops a few hundred dollars more, it will bleed out

View OriginalReply0

TeaTimeTrader

· 6h ago

Playing 93 Bitcoin with 25x leverage, this guy really isn't afraid of death. The risk of liquidation is ridiculously high. I wouldn't dare to follow such aggressive moves. A $10,000 unrealized profit is useless if there's a pullback—it could explode at any moment. Whales are opening and closing positions intensively, indicating that the market judgment might also be uncertain. I prefer to relax and watch the market with tea. Leverage is great when you're making money, but when you lose, it's really a instant knockout. This brother is either a master or a gambler; I can't tell the difference right now.

View OriginalReply0

tx_pending_forever

· 6h ago

Playing with 25x leverage so aggressively, a sudden pullback would probably trigger liquidation, right? This guy's risk tolerance is quite high.

View OriginalReply0

VirtualRichDream

· 6h ago

Playing with 93 Bitcoins using 25x leverage—this guy is really tough. A thousand dollars in profit within an hour, his mental resilience must be strong.

View OriginalReply0