Bitcoin enters a new institutionalized phase: ETF and corporate treasury holdings hit record highs, with a target price of $300,000 to $1,500,000 by 2030

LiquiditySurfer · 2026-01-15T14:40:14+00:00

Bitcoin will no longer rely on retail investor confidence in the future but will be influenced by institutional investors. As spot ETFs launch in 2024, the institutionalization trend accelerates, driving Bitcoin prices toward the 2030 target fluctuations. Meanwhile, declining volatility attracts more low-risk investors, changing the market structure.

LiquiditySurfer

2026-01-15 14:40:14

Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】The future of Bitcoin is no longer a contest of confidence. Ark Invest analyst David Puell recently pointed out that a key shift has occurred—the decisive factor now is how much exposure institutional investors are willing to take and which tools they choose to participate with.

The launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs in 2024 marks a watershed moment. Subsequently, corporate digital asset treasury strategies have exploded, leading to a qualitative change in the entire ecosystem. When digital assets speak: the combined Bitcoin holdings of ETFs and corporate treasuries have already approached 12% of the total supply. This figure far exceeds expectations and is considered the most surprising increase of last year.

What does this mean? Bitcoin has moved beyond the retail-driven phase and has officially entered a period of institutional maturity. This trend will become the main driver of price movements in 2025 and even 2026. The rapid accumulation of Bitcoin by institutions has directly reduced market volatility, making the entire ecosystem more stable and mature.

Ark Invest has not changed its long-term outlook. Their valuation models present three scenarios for 2030: a bear market at around $300,000, a baseline scenario at $710,000, and a bull market at $1,500,000. Driven by the dual narratives of “digital gold” and institutional adoption, they remain optimistic about Bitcoin’s performance within this range.

Interestingly, as volatility continues to decline and drawdowns become smaller, Bitcoin is becoming increasingly attractive to investors with lower risk tolerance. Institutionalization has not only changed trading patterns but is also quietly transforming the investor composition.

BTC-1,77%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCry

· 01-16 23:46

Institutions have accumulated 12% of the supply, while retail investors are still on the sidelines. The gap is huge.

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurnerSociety

· 01-16 10:28

Institution takes over, and we retail investors have to rely on luck again --- 12% holding volume? Feels like my tiny amount of coins is more valuable now haha --- Volatility has decreased, but my loss rate hasn't --- So basically, now it all depends on the mood of the institutional bigwigs to determine the market trend --- Damn, this is true "whale trading," I used to think I was just trading coins --- Once the ETF launches, it directly rewrites the game rules. Our "confidence" has become the institutional chips --- Stable and mature? No, I haven't been losing a little lately, it's not stable --- Is 12% far from $300,000? Asking that is far, my account has already been liquidated in advance

View OriginalReply0

ser_we_are_early

· 01-16 09:50

Institutions are疯狂扫货, retail investors are still debating whether to buy or not, is the gap really that big? --- 12% holding volume indicates what? It means institutions have already set the tone, and we newcomers need to keep up. --- Low volatility is actually less interesting; the big swings and rises before were more刺激... --- Wait, is there a problem with this logic? Institutions entering stabilize the market, doesn't that also reduce opportunities for small retail investors? --- From 30 to 1.5 million, that’s quite a gap. Who can really predict? --- Spot ETF really changes everything; it feels like the previous trading strategies need to be改了. --- I'm麻了, it seems I really need to get on board, or else I’ll be left far behind by institutions. --- The corporate treasury thing shows that BTC has truly become a "store of value," no longer just a gambling tool. --- But the question is, with institutions eating up so much, will they also face difficulties in unloading?

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 01-15 15:07

Is the 12% figure real? It seems a bit exaggerated.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTherapist

· 01-15 15:07

Institutions have really taken over retail business, and with the lower volatility, it feels a bit less exciting... But thinking about it, a 12% holding volume is indeed quite intimidating.

View OriginalReply0

Token_Sherpa

· 01-15 15:05

lol so now it's just about institutional appetite? guess retail got benched. but ngl, 12% concentration feels kinda sus for "maturity"—isn't that just velocity trap with extra steps?

Reply0

ForkMonger

· 01-15 15:01

nah the real play here is watching when these institutions hit their governance attack vectors... 12% concentration? that's just asking for systemic vulnerabilities down the line. sure, lower volatility sounds nice but it's also the margin of disruption they need to actually control the narrative. etf flows are just the trojan horse imo

Reply0

AirdropAnxiety

· 01-15 14:57

Retail investors are really being pushed out. How are small investors like us supposed to play... Institutions are so aggressive, with low volatility there's actually no chance anymore. 12% sounds not much, but if I really get in... I have no confidence. I should have gone all in on the day the ETF launched. Now chasing the high, I'm a bit panicked.

View OriginalReply0

BasementAlchemist

· 01-15 14:56

Oh my god, I had to read the 12% figure three times before I realized it. Retail investors are really being marginalized.

View OriginalReply0