#数字资产市场动态 2026 Stablecoin and RWA Controversy Intensifies
The dialogue between Wall Street and new crypto elites is heating up. The focus? Digital tokens claiming to offer investors annualized returns.
The issue isn't so simple. A leading crypto platform offering about 3.5% annualized yield on stablecoins looks attractive. But the traditional banking logic is: this is just a deposit product, but without the regulatory burdens we face. So, the banking industry is pressuring Congress—saying this could threaten small and medium-sized banks. Comparing it to the current interest rates on US checking accounts, which are less than 0.1%, you understand why banks are anxious.
This tug-of-war directly impacts policy progress. The Senate Banking Committee's planned vote on the cryptocurrency market structure bill scheduled for Thursday has been postponed.
Interestingly, major banks like JPMorgan and Citibank oppose stablecoin yield mechanisms, yet secretly prepare their own crypto products. US banks are even considering issuing their own stablecoins. This is what you call a fight on both sides.
The current situation is: a well-known platform has withdrawn support for the bill, which could cast a shadow over the entire legislative process. Other crypto companies are still insisting, but their voices are noticeably weaker. The deeper issue behind this is clear—the rapidly emerging crypto industry in Washington over the past few years is using increasingly powerful lobbying efforts to counter traditional financial giants that have been connected to Congress for decades. This power game is far from over.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MintMaster
· 17h ago
Banks are getting anxious; a 3.5% return really confused them. This is outrageous—why can stablecoins make money while they have to lose money?
View OriginalReply0
DegenTherapist
· 17h ago
The real joke is when the banks panic. They dare to impose stablecoins while offering only 0.1% interest rates? The term "mutual struggle" is used too perfectly here.
View OriginalReply0
StakeTillRetire
· 17h ago
The banks are really panicking now; 3.5% crushes their 0.1%. This must be what it feels like to be abandoned by the times. But seeing JPMorgan Chase secretly developing its own stablecoin, as the saying goes—"The Law of Fragrance" will never deceive.
View OriginalReply0
WealthCoffee
· 17h ago
Haha, the bank is getting nervous. A 3.5% return really makes them break out in a cold sweat. They only manage 0.1% themselves and still have the nerve to talk about low risk.
View OriginalReply0
RuntimeError
· 17h ago
Banks are getting nervous, basically afraid of a revolution. 3.5% compared to 0.1%, anyone would be furious about this gap.
#数字资产市场动态 2026 Stablecoin and RWA Controversy Intensifies
The dialogue between Wall Street and new crypto elites is heating up. The focus? Digital tokens claiming to offer investors annualized returns.
The issue isn't so simple. A leading crypto platform offering about 3.5% annualized yield on stablecoins looks attractive. But the traditional banking logic is: this is just a deposit product, but without the regulatory burdens we face. So, the banking industry is pressuring Congress—saying this could threaten small and medium-sized banks. Comparing it to the current interest rates on US checking accounts, which are less than 0.1%, you understand why banks are anxious.
This tug-of-war directly impacts policy progress. The Senate Banking Committee's planned vote on the cryptocurrency market structure bill scheduled for Thursday has been postponed.
Interestingly, major banks like JPMorgan and Citibank oppose stablecoin yield mechanisms, yet secretly prepare their own crypto products. US banks are even considering issuing their own stablecoins. This is what you call a fight on both sides.
The current situation is: a well-known platform has withdrawn support for the bill, which could cast a shadow over the entire legislative process. Other crypto companies are still insisting, but their voices are noticeably weaker. The deeper issue behind this is clear—the rapidly emerging crypto industry in Washington over the past few years is using increasingly powerful lobbying efforts to counter traditional financial giants that have been connected to Congress for decades. This power game is far from over.