2026-01-16 07:11:39

#美国民主党BlueVault The US crypto legislation negotiations are entering a critical phase, and several decisions could be made in the next few days.

To be clear, the current deadlock mainly hinges on the "profit" clause. How to handle the profits from tokenized securities—opinions vary widely among parties. Some trading platforms want to significantly revise or even delete this clause, believing that the current version could stifle innovation. However, tokenization companies do not fully agree with this idea, and there is ongoing tug-of-war.

Although the Senate Banking Committee has paused its review, this does not mean the entire process has stopped. If Democrats and Republicans can reach a truly effective agreement, it might actually accelerate progress. Discussions are also ongoing with the Agriculture Committee, and the White House is still in dialogue with the Senate.

We are now just waiting for the results in the coming days. The future regulatory framework for crypto in the US largely depends on how this game ends. $BTC $ETH $SOL Everyone is paying close attention to this development, as policy directions directly impact market expectations.

BTC-0,19%

ETH0,56%

SOL-0,55%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkPrince

· 01-16 07:39

Profit clause issues are really annoying. Exchanges want to delete the clause, but tokenization companies disagree. This tug-of-war is likely to continue. This week is indeed critical, but to be honest, I care more about whether we can finally loosen the restrictions. I hope it won't end up being a half-baked solution.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropCollector

· 01-16 07:37

As for the profit terms, trading platforms and tokenization companies each blow their own horns. Frankly, it's still a conflict of interest. If they really want to delete it, I don't think it's very likely; in the end, it will definitely be a compromised version.

View OriginalReply0

governance_ghost

· 01-16 07:20

Once again, it's the profit clause causing trouble, with exchanges and token companies fighting each other. In the end, it's us retail investors who suffer.

View OriginalReply0