Anyone who has truly engaged in deep development in the fields of blockchain privacy and zero-knowledge proofs will honestly acknowledge a core pain point: ZK is never about functionality feasibility, but about performance usability. No matter how exquisite the papers and whitepapers are, once it comes to actual deployment, proof generation times often take tens of seconds or even minutes, causing user experience to collapse.



Many public chains on the market claim to support zero-knowledge proofs, but in practice, they forcibly integrate circuit logic within the EVM framework. Although this approach is theoretically feasible, the actual experience is extremely strained—like using a tractor on a highway—no matter how much you press the accelerator, you can't achieve the expected efficiency.

In the past few years, very few chains have been able to handle complex privacy logic. The reason is not that cryptographic theory is still immature, but that the underlying execution environment completely cannot keep up with the demand. This is precisely why Dusk has taken a completely different engineering approach: instead of patching on top of EVM, it is better to redesign from the virtual machine layer, leading to the development of the Piecrust virtual machine.

The positioning of the Piecrust VM is very clear—it does not pursue generality, but is a dedicated execution environment for zero-knowledge computations. The importance of this design choice is often overlooked. EVM is fundamentally optimized for state determinism and reusability, and has never considered proof friendliness. Running zero-knowledge computations on EVM is like executing business logic while also bearing the huge overhead of proofs.

Dusk reverses this thinking: since the goal is privacy and verifiable computation, the execution model, instruction set, and state management design should be centered around zero-knowledge proofs from day one. The result is a seemingly counterintuitive but practically feasible performance leap—proof generation time is significantly compressed, truly turning ZK from an ideal on paper into a usable product.
DUSK69,36%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
consensus_failurevip
· 18h ago
Anything on paper is fine, but once it comes to actual combat, it falls apart. This is the true portrayal of ZK. Wait, can Dusk's Piecrust VM really run, or is it just another hype concept... Forcibly inserting ZK logic into EVM is like hammering nails with a big hammer; problems are bound to arise sooner or later. Whether the dedicated VM path is correct depends on real-world testing data; just hype won't do. By the way, has anyone actually used Dusk's products? The market seems quite hot, but real feedback is scarce. This is the proper engineering approach. Instead of patching things together, it's better to redesign from the ground up. ZK needs to be practical to be valuable. A project that only exists on paper without real users is meaningless. The idea of a dedicated Piecrust design is indeed innovative, but whether it can truly outperform EVM's performance remains to be seen.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTearsvip
· 19h ago
Another metaphor of a tractor on the highway, but this time it seems like someone really wants to solve it?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterXvip
· 19h ago
Damn, EVM compatibility with ZK is a major flaw. It's high time to change the approach.
View OriginalReply0
FreeMintervip
· 19h ago
It's the old familiar talk about ZK performance, but Dusk's approach is indeed different. Now I understand why so many chains hype ZK results with PPT projects; the root cause was actually wrong. Piecrust's move is a bit aggressive, and a dedicated VM really is a way out. But can it really run? We have to wait and see the actual data speak. Forcibly patching EVM is indeed like a tractor racing—what a perfect analogy, haha. This is the correct design stance, considering ZK from the bottom layer. It feels like the crypto world really lacks projects that are willing to do solid hard work.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)