In the world of Web3 finance, trust is the foundation of everything, and security is the guarantee of trust. One project starts from the underlying design to create a comprehensive protection system for financial assets, not just to defend against hackers, but to build an all-encompassing defense line integrating technology, compliance, and privacy.
How do traditional blockchains ensure security? Mainly through two methods: one is computational power competition, and the other is token staking. These approaches can indeed prevent transaction records from being tampered with, but they are not sufficient for financial-grade applications. True financial security requires deeper considerations—transaction logic must be correct and compliant with regulations.
This project’s approach is quite interesting: using formal verification to build smart contracts. It sounds complex, but it’s essentially translating financial rules (for example, "only addresses verified through KYC can receive security tokens") into mathematical language, then rigorously proving them from a mathematical perspective, eliminating code vulnerabilities at the source. It’s like installing an unbreakable "mathematical lock" on financial contracts.
Regarding privacy, they didn’t choose the "completely anonymous" route, which could easily become a hotbed for illegal activities. Instead, they opted for "auditable privacy"—using cryptographic techniques like zero-knowledge proofs to keep transaction details confidential from the outside world, while allowing internal systems and authorized auditors to see the details clearly. This design protects business secrets and personal privacy, while ensuring the entire network operates within a compliant framework, avoiding systemic risks caused by violations.
Finally, modular architecture provides flexibility. Each functional module can be independently strengthened, making security defenses more resilient and adaptable to changing needs. When these designs are combined, they form a protection mechanism that truly works for financial assets.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiAlchemist
· 23h ago
*adjusts alchemical instruments* the formal verification angle here hits different... they're literally encoding financial rules into mathematical axioms, which is basically transmuting regulatory compliance into cryptographic certainty. the philosopher's stone of defi architecture, if you ask me.
Reply0
0xLostKey
· 23h ago
Wow, formal verification is indeed tough; this is what true financial-grade security should look like.
In the world of Web3 finance, trust is the foundation of everything, and security is the guarantee of trust. One project starts from the underlying design to create a comprehensive protection system for financial assets, not just to defend against hackers, but to build an all-encompassing defense line integrating technology, compliance, and privacy.
How do traditional blockchains ensure security? Mainly through two methods: one is computational power competition, and the other is token staking. These approaches can indeed prevent transaction records from being tampered with, but they are not sufficient for financial-grade applications. True financial security requires deeper considerations—transaction logic must be correct and compliant with regulations.
This project’s approach is quite interesting: using formal verification to build smart contracts. It sounds complex, but it’s essentially translating financial rules (for example, "only addresses verified through KYC can receive security tokens") into mathematical language, then rigorously proving them from a mathematical perspective, eliminating code vulnerabilities at the source. It’s like installing an unbreakable "mathematical lock" on financial contracts.
Regarding privacy, they didn’t choose the "completely anonymous" route, which could easily become a hotbed for illegal activities. Instead, they opted for "auditable privacy"—using cryptographic techniques like zero-knowledge proofs to keep transaction details confidential from the outside world, while allowing internal systems and authorized auditors to see the details clearly. This design protects business secrets and personal privacy, while ensuring the entire network operates within a compliant framework, avoiding systemic risks caused by violations.
Finally, modular architecture provides flexibility. Each functional module can be independently strengthened, making security defenses more resilient and adaptable to changing needs. When these designs are combined, they form a protection mechanism that truly works for financial assets.