Whether this coin can continue to attract funds depends mainly on whether there is always active trading in the market. As long as a tax mechanism is combined with a destruction logic, a positive feedback loop can be formed—tax revenue is used for destruction, providing price support and attracting more participants. But reality is often harsher: after the hype cools down, trading volume will sharply decline, and the destruction力度 will also decrease accordingly. Whether enthusiasm can be reignited at that time is really uncertain. When market sentiment shifts, these tokens usually become a thing of the past. Therefore, the key still depends on whether there will be new incremental funds or application scenarios to maintain the热度.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SignatureAnxietyvip
· 16h ago
Basically, it's about how long they can keep burning tokens. Once no one plays anymore, it's game over. I'm tired of this tax-based destruction trick.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabondvip
· 18h ago
Basically, it's about whether they can sell to the last batch of bagholders.
View OriginalReply0
VitaliksTwinvip
· 18h ago
Basically, it's about whether they can keep scamming investors. Coins without real use cases will eventually fade away.
View OriginalReply0
PermabullPetevip
· 18h ago
It just sounds like a vicious cycle. Once the hype dies down, it's over, and the destruction mechanism can't save it.
View OriginalReply0
ChainPoetvip
· 18h ago
In simple terms, this set of logic is hyped up during a bull market, but in a bear market, it's all just bubbles. --- Burn mechanism? Ha, once the hype dies down, it's just a joke. --- The key is to have real application scenarios; otherwise, it will eventually cool off. --- Tax-based burn? Sounds good, but in reality, it's just self-deception. --- Incremental funds are the real key; without a blood supply, no matter how fancy the mechanism, it will die. --- I've seen through it; these types of coins are just a game of musical chairs—once the music stops, it's over. --- Active trading? Ha, running volume on decentralized exchanges, and the mainnet can't even stay active for a few. --- Positive feedback? That's too idealistic; in reality, it's just whales dumping and retail investors fleeing.
View OriginalReply0
All-InQueenvip
· 18h ago
Basically, it's a vampire mechanism that won't last long.
View OriginalReply0
LightningSentryvip
· 18h ago
In plain terms, the destruction mechanism has long been played out. Without real traffic and applications, even the most attractive economic models are just paper tigers.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidatorvip
· 19h ago
That's right, most projects die at the stage of "maintaining popularity." No matter how perfect the theory of taxation and destruction is, without fresh blood entering the scene, it's all in vain. In the end, it's still the fate of a Ponzi scheme.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)