If the token burn and reflow mechanisms are well-designed, they can indeed enhance the resilience of the project's liquidity pool. Burning reduces circulating supply, while reflow injects ecological value. The combination of the two can create a virtuous cycle. Under this model, the liquidity pool is not only sufficient in quantity but also backed by a more solid economic logic, which is beneficial for the long-term stability of the project's ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseVagabond
· 16h ago
The combination of burn + reflow is indeed powerful; the key still depends on how well the execution is carried out.
View OriginalReply0
DogeBachelor
· 16h ago
The combination of destruction + reflow needs to be truly implemented; there are too many projects that look good on paper.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 16h ago
Properly coordinated destruction and reflow are indeed effective; the only concern is that the project team might end up just being a tool for harvesting retail investors.
If the token burn and reflow mechanisms are well-designed, they can indeed enhance the resilience of the project's liquidity pool. Burning reduces circulating supply, while reflow injects ecological value. The combination of the two can create a virtuous cycle. Under this model, the liquidity pool is not only sufficient in quantity but also backed by a more solid economic logic, which is beneficial for the long-term stability of the project's ecosystem.