If the token burn and reflow mechanisms are well-designed, they can indeed enhance the resilience of the project's liquidity pool. Burning reduces circulating supply, while reflow injects ecological value. The combination of the two can create a virtuous cycle. Under this model, the liquidity pool is not only sufficient in quantity but also backed by a more solid economic logic, which is beneficial for the long-term stability of the project's ecosystem.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseVagabondvip
· 16h ago
The combination of burn + reflow is indeed powerful; the key still depends on how well the execution is carried out.
View OriginalReply0
DogeBachelorvip
· 16h ago
The combination of destruction + reflow needs to be truly implemented; there are too many projects that look good on paper.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 16h ago
Properly coordinated destruction and reflow are indeed effective; the only concern is that the project team might end up just being a tool for harvesting retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)