2026-01-16 07:32:21

#数字资产市场动态 Exchanges issuing their own tokens and participating in chain launches, to put it simply, is a conflict of interest. They are both rule makers and participants and beneficiaries—if this were traditional financial markets, this approach would never pass regulatory scrutiny. How could a securities exchange issue stocks? Yet centralized trading platforms often play on the edge. For the crypto ecosystem to truly be healthy, this line must be clearly drawn.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SybilAttackVictim

· 18h ago

This is the real core tumor of the crypto world: exchanges acting as both referees and players, blatantly engaging in self-trading.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropNinja

· 18h ago

Exchanges issuing their own tokens is just ridiculous; they set the rules and make the profits themselves. Everyone can see through this.

View OriginalReply0

LayerHopper

· 18h ago

This is the common problem in the crypto world: setting the rules themselves and taking the profits. Traditional finance has long been beaten.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainFoodie

· 18h ago

it's literally like asking a michelin-starred restaurant to also rate itself... except the restaurant owns the whole supply chain, the farms AND the critic reviews lol. the governance collapse is real fr fr

Reply0

PumpStrategist

· 18h ago

Ha, this is the "creativity" of the crypto world—exchanges act as both referees and players, with the distribution of chips clearly visible, but no one dares to tell the truth.

View OriginalReply0