I attended a Starknet event last year, mainly to discuss how to grow the Asia-Pacific market. However, I found that the team’s attitude was not very cooperative, and communication was quite awkward. Later, I decided to focus on Solana and discovered that their expansion approach in the Asia-Pacific region is completely different—open, pragmatic, and genuinely committed to doing things. In fact, for public chains, the ecosystem layout ultimately depends on the people. You can tell right away whether the team has the drive. Now, as I’m responsible for Asia-Pacific growth at Solana, I feel the direction is very clear, and this difference is quite obvious. Choosing a project that truly wants to move forward is really important.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CrashHotline
· 7h ago
That's the difference. Starknet is indeed a bit aloof, while Solana is much more pragmatic.
The team's attitude really can determine everything. A project with no enthusiasm is just talking technicals in vain.
I agree, the Asia-Pacific market needs to find those who genuinely want to get things done.
Solana's approach in APAC is indeed clear, unlike some projects that just shout slogans.
It's easy to see who is serious and who is just perfunctory. Choosing the right ecosystem is really important.
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHunter
· 7h ago
Starknet's attitude is indeed disappointing. In contrast, Solana really dares to delegate authority and let you do your thing. That's the reason the ecosystem can thrive.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLicker
· 7h ago
You guys over at Starknet really don't understand Asia-Pacific. The poor attitude can drive people away. I don't believe there aren't other pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuru
· 7h ago
Really, you can see at a glance the team's attitude. Starknet is indeed a bit uncooperative.
On the other hand, SOL is different, very pragmatic, and gets things done.
Choosing the right track is more important than anything else.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemur
· 7h ago
That's why I've long felt that Starknet doesn't seem right; the team's attitude is really dragging it down.
I attended a Starknet event last year, mainly to discuss how to grow the Asia-Pacific market. However, I found that the team’s attitude was not very cooperative, and communication was quite awkward. Later, I decided to focus on Solana and discovered that their expansion approach in the Asia-Pacific region is completely different—open, pragmatic, and genuinely committed to doing things. In fact, for public chains, the ecosystem layout ultimately depends on the people. You can tell right away whether the team has the drive. Now, as I’m responsible for Asia-Pacific growth at Solana, I feel the direction is very clear, and this difference is quite obvious. Choosing a project that truly wants to move forward is really important.