Kaito started out as a genuinely innovative product with real potential. At its core, it delivered significant value to the protocol and dapp ecosystem—bringing visibility, user attention, and genuine interest to projects that would've otherwise struggled for mindshare.
Did the system eventually become flawed and exploited? Without question. Over time, gaming and abuse emerged as inevitable problems. But here's the thing: initially, this product genuinely cracked open new opportunities for ecosystem growth. The mechanism worked because it aligned incentives in a way that felt fresh and different from what the market had seen before.
It's a classic story—innovation creates value, then exploitation follows.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
UnluckyLemur
· 11h ago
NGL Kaito initially was a stroke of genius, but later it just fell apart.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLover
· 11h ago
Kaito indeed started off well, but now it seems... it has long since become spoiled. The initial incentive mechanism was truly innovative, but later on, all kinds of experts rushed in to exploit the system, and the entire ecosystem collapsed.
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHere
· 11h ago
NGL, Kaito initially had some potential, but it got played out, and that's what it deserves. This is Web3...
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizard
· 11h ago
Kaito was truly innovative at first, but later it was ruined, a typical Web3 story.
View OriginalReply0
WenMoon
· 11h ago
Kaito was indeed a killer move at first, but then it got ruined. It's a typical cycle of innovation → arbitrage → death.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 12h ago
Innovation quickly falls into ruin... really, it's always the same pattern, when market sentiment is high, people forget human nature
---
It's another dead story in a cycle; no matter how good the original intention, it ultimately gets played out
---
Kaito, honestly, is just good stuff meeting people who want quick profits. Who can you blame?
---
That's why I don't really believe in those overnight viral mechanisms... the halo usually fades the fastest
---
Before value reverts, bubbles must burst and illusions shatter. This survival rule has never changed, only people forget each time
---
The essence of innovation is to make the cake bigger, but those who truly profit are always the ones thinking about how to monopolize it
---
Once you see through it, early stages are really useful, mid-term starts to turn sour, and late-stage becomes unrecognizable... just history repeating
---
So, the bottom line is: only by surviving this beaten-up project can you truly stay alive
View OriginalReply0
LightningClicker
· 12h ago
NGL, Kaito was indeed a stroke of genius back then. Later downfall is probably the eternal fate of Web3.
Kaito started out as a genuinely innovative product with real potential. At its core, it delivered significant value to the protocol and dapp ecosystem—bringing visibility, user attention, and genuine interest to projects that would've otherwise struggled for mindshare.
Did the system eventually become flawed and exploited? Without question. Over time, gaming and abuse emerged as inevitable problems. But here's the thing: initially, this product genuinely cracked open new opportunities for ecosystem growth. The mechanism worked because it aligned incentives in a way that felt fresh and different from what the market had seen before.
It's a classic story—innovation creates value, then exploitation follows.