Sharing a recent investment experience. On January 13th, I bought in at a price of 480,000, successfully sold at 3,000,000, and made a good profit. Later, seeing that the project's fundamentals were still solid, I decided to buy back all at the 2,100,000 level, and the amount of tokens is even more than before.



Why re-enter the market? There are mainly three reasons:

First, the project's concept of "everyone is a small shareholder" is really interesting. This statement is concise and powerful, easy to spread, and aligns with the current community consensus aesthetic.

Second, the market itself is very solid. I observed the candlestick chart of this coin; the 2,000,000 price zone has been maintained for quite a long time, consistently resisting declines, and the trend looks particularly comfortable. This kind of stability controlled by large players is uncommon and indicates that there is indeed strong capital backing the market.

The third and most crucial point—this project has already been listed on Gate's contract trading, which signifies recognition by the exchange. It has also been included in the mainstream platform's attention list, indicating that its popularity and compliance are both assured.

Of course, investing involves risks. This is just my personal record and reflection. Everyone should do their own research before entering the market.
小股东22,81%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ShadowStakervip
· 11h ago
ngl the "everyone's a small shareholder" pitch is just marketing fluff dressed up as philosophy... but yeah exchange listing does signal *something*
Reply0
DaoResearchervip
· 11h ago
From the perspective of Token economics, this governance promise of "everyone being a small shareholder" is essentially an incentive-incompatible design... According to the white paper, market-supporting behaviors actually contradict the original intention of decentralization.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 11h ago
480,000 to 3,000,000 and then recover, this move definitely has some skill, feels good.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAOvip
· 11h ago
Wait, "Everyone is a small shareholder" sounds as sweet as some failed DAO governance experiments... This concept itself is a trap of incentive distortion. Truly maintaining a balance of rights and interests is not that easy.
View OriginalReply0
XiaoLilivip
· 11h ago
Still the same advice: if you think you can go long, go long; if not, go short. If you think this project isn't good, then don't do it. Personal opinion.
View OriginalReply0
View More
GateUser-78c8f0c8vip
· 11h ago
Can minority shareholders still profit?
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLabvip
· 11h ago
Another story of "Everyone is a small shareholder." It sounds theoretically feasible, but in reality, it's just another useless innovation. But to be fair, being able to copy from 480,000 to 3 million and then recover is already a small experiment with maximum value. The candlestick charts are maintained so well, indicating that someone is working on it. Lu Ban No.7 has started again.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)