I recently watched an AMA live stream featuring a senior executive from a leading exchange. Although most of the content wasn't particularly groundbreaking, the topic of the "super cycle" caught my attention.
He mentioned some interesting details about the super cycle—such as the possibility that the bear market after 2026 might break the traditional four-year cycle pattern, and a prediction that the next bull run could push BTC to at least $200,000. However, after hearing these, I was reminded of the traditional four-year cycle theory. I took a closer look and found that the two logics are not actually contradictory.
First, let's look at the weekly intervals. According to the four-year cycle, the high points of each bull market are roughly 1430 to 1460 days apart, and the bear market from peak to bottom usually lasts around 365 days. This data has been validated over several cycles and remains quite stable.
Next, let's examine the growth patterns. Interestingly, the percentage increase beyond the previous high in each bull run has been decreasing, showing an exponential decay trend. Specifically, the recent bull markets surpassed the previous highs by 1497%, 248%, and 83%, respectively. Using the latest prediction of $200,000 for the next cycle, this suggests an approximate increase of 61% for this round.
Correspondingly, the decline during bear markets has also been decreasing linearly. The drops from peak to bottom in the last three bear markets were 86.58%, 84.22%, and 77.57%. Projecting this trend linearly, this cycle might see a decline of about 71.9%. This seems to validate the idea that the market is gradually "soft landing."
There's another notable phenomenon—the time it takes for the market to fall from a high point to near the bottom is getting shorter. In the past three bear markets, BTC took 396 days, 335 days, and 212 days from the peak to near the bottom. Following this linear shortening trend, this cycle might only take around 182 days. What does this imply? That the window for bottom-fishing is becoming increasingly narrow.
Based on these data points, I did a projection: regardless of whether the super cycle exists, from the perspective of the slow evolution of the four-year cycle, this bear market is likely to bottom out between April and May of this year, with a price range roughly between $35,000 and $50,000. Afterward, the market could restart the next bull cycle around September this year, ultimately reaching the cycle's top around September 2029, which aligns with the predicted $2 million mark.
Thinking this way, the four-year cycle doesn't seem to be completely outdated—it's just shifting. The most obvious change is that the duration of bull markets is lengthening, but the magnitude of each rally is shrinking; bear markets are shortening, but the depth of declines is becoming shallower. Market volatility is becoming less extreme.
If this cycle model remains valid, then the strategy is quite clear. Starting from the second half of this year, adopt a dollar-cost averaging approach to accumulate BTC, holding until around Q4 2029. Based on this cycle projection, the average return could be approximately 600%. Of course, this requires patience to endure the current bear market and confidence that this cycle theory isn't completely invalidated.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkTongue
· 6h ago
Data enthusiasts are back again. This cycle theory is indeed interesting, but brother, your predictions ultimately still rely on faith to hold up.
The four-year cycle shrinkage is a fact, right? Dropped from 1497% to 61%. If the gains in the next bull market are even lower, it won't be interesting anymore.
The 182-day bottom-fishing window is a bit harsh. If it keeps compressing like this, even a two-second delay could cause you to fall behind.
But on the other hand, that 2029 figure of 2 million sounds like a story. Feels like both the executives and you are just confirming something to each other.
DCA of 600% sounds great, but the problem is, who can hold on for the past two years? Mindset is more critical than data, right?
The cycle theory might fail at any moment, and when that happens, this entire deduction will be completely worthless.
Honestly, I want to know if you'll actually follow this plan, or will your mindset collapse first in the end.
View OriginalReply0
PretendingToReadDocs
· 11h ago
The data is quite solid, but listening to the cycle theory is just for reference. Betting your entire fortune on 2029 is a bit risky.
Just looking at the prediction that prices could drop to 35-50k in April and May makes it seem very uncertain. When has the market ever followed the script exactly?
The idea of a 600% investment space sounds good, but only if you survive until then. Who knows if this bear market won't bring another black swan?
I don't believe the 2 million USD BTC prediction at all. The statements from executives should be taken with a grain of salt, maybe even less.
It still seems that fundamentals matter most. Pure cycle theory has been proven wrong so many times already.
View OriginalReply0
HodlKumamon
· 11h ago
The data speaks for itself. This 182-day bottom-fishing window is one to cherish. The bear's calculator is already eager and impatient.
Wait, a 71.9% decline... This means we'll have to eat dirt for a while, but the good news is that the bear market is becoming more gentle.
Investing regularly until 2029 yields a 600% return? I think the premise is actually just two words—survive. Don't panic and sell.
What the bear finds most impressive is this linear projection. Each cycle is becoming "lazier," and the market seems to be telling us it's tired and heading for a soft landing.
The window from April to May near the bottom has been marked, and the exit point will be clear by then.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWanderingPoet
· 11h ago
Buddy, your data scraping is absolutely on point. The 182-day bottoming window doesn't give people any time to react at all.
Wait, is your linear projection really reliable? It feels a bit too good to be true.
That 35-50k range, I need to seriously think it over. The premise is that history will really repeat itself.
600% sounds great, but 2029 is still too far away. There are too many variables in between, who can say for sure?
This logic is basically betting that the 4-year cycle hasn't completely failed yet. How should I put it... it's kind of interesting.
The decreasing bear market duration is a nice reverse validation idea, but I need to look again at the shallower dips.
A Bitcoin reaching 2 million is basically a fantasy, but based on this thinking, it wouldn't be too crazy to consider in the second half of the year.
Although the cycle theory has been played out a bit, your angle of incremental decline is indeed fresh. I have to admit.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 11h ago
Wait, are we buying the dip at 35k to 50k? I just want to ask, does this wave still have to fall so much more?
View OriginalReply0
SudoRm-RfWallet/
· 11h ago
Damn, this data deduction is pretty impressive. The 185-day bottoming window has kept me busy for these two months.
Wait, can it really hit 35-50k? It feels like the market sentiment isn't as pessimistic now.
This logical chain is a bit terrifying in its self-consistency. I just wonder if spot traders' greed can align so perfectly.
Hmm... Dollar-cost averaging until 2029, it would be pretty awkward if I don't make it that far, haha.
Data speaks louder than executives' bluster. I believe in this.
View OriginalReply0
LongTermDreamer
· 11h ago
Bro, your data digging is really detailed, it's making me a bit hesitant.
DCA until 2029? Sounds good, but I'm just worried it might be all talk, and when the bear market hits again, I'll cut losses and do short-term trading.
Honestly, this cycle theory always feels like armchair quarterbacking afterward, very effective, but the key is whether we can really endure the emotional grind from April to May.
I bet five bucks that the prediction of the bottom at 35k to 50k will be proven wrong. In the crypto world, the more accurate the prediction, the more likely it is to reverse.
But your logic is quite coherent, I like the term "soft landing," it sounds much better than complete bankruptcy.
I recently watched an AMA live stream featuring a senior executive from a leading exchange. Although most of the content wasn't particularly groundbreaking, the topic of the "super cycle" caught my attention.
He mentioned some interesting details about the super cycle—such as the possibility that the bear market after 2026 might break the traditional four-year cycle pattern, and a prediction that the next bull run could push BTC to at least $200,000. However, after hearing these, I was reminded of the traditional four-year cycle theory. I took a closer look and found that the two logics are not actually contradictory.
First, let's look at the weekly intervals. According to the four-year cycle, the high points of each bull market are roughly 1430 to 1460 days apart, and the bear market from peak to bottom usually lasts around 365 days. This data has been validated over several cycles and remains quite stable.
Next, let's examine the growth patterns. Interestingly, the percentage increase beyond the previous high in each bull run has been decreasing, showing an exponential decay trend. Specifically, the recent bull markets surpassed the previous highs by 1497%, 248%, and 83%, respectively. Using the latest prediction of $200,000 for the next cycle, this suggests an approximate increase of 61% for this round.
Correspondingly, the decline during bear markets has also been decreasing linearly. The drops from peak to bottom in the last three bear markets were 86.58%, 84.22%, and 77.57%. Projecting this trend linearly, this cycle might see a decline of about 71.9%. This seems to validate the idea that the market is gradually "soft landing."
There's another notable phenomenon—the time it takes for the market to fall from a high point to near the bottom is getting shorter. In the past three bear markets, BTC took 396 days, 335 days, and 212 days from the peak to near the bottom. Following this linear shortening trend, this cycle might only take around 182 days. What does this imply? That the window for bottom-fishing is becoming increasingly narrow.
Based on these data points, I did a projection: regardless of whether the super cycle exists, from the perspective of the slow evolution of the four-year cycle, this bear market is likely to bottom out between April and May of this year, with a price range roughly between $35,000 and $50,000. Afterward, the market could restart the next bull cycle around September this year, ultimately reaching the cycle's top around September 2029, which aligns with the predicted $2 million mark.
Thinking this way, the four-year cycle doesn't seem to be completely outdated—it's just shifting. The most obvious change is that the duration of bull markets is lengthening, but the magnitude of each rally is shrinking; bear markets are shortening, but the depth of declines is becoming shallower. Market volatility is becoming less extreme.
If this cycle model remains valid, then the strategy is quite clear. Starting from the second half of this year, adopt a dollar-cost averaging approach to accumulate BTC, holding until around Q4 2029. Based on this cycle projection, the average return could be approximately 600%. Of course, this requires patience to endure the current bear market and confidence that this cycle theory isn't completely invalidated.