Belgium's second-largest bank, KBC, has taken a step that essentially opens a small door for traditional finance to enter the crypto space.



Let's look at the core setup: relying on the EU MiCAR regulatory framework, KBC has launched trading services for BTC and ETH. The model is very clear—only execution, maintaining a closed loop, and providing custody. Compliance goes without saying, but the constraints are indeed tight.

From an industry perspective, this is a signal that crypto assets are gradually being "mainstream recognized." The MiCAR framework itself is an exploration by the EU to regulate the crypto market. The fact that banks dare to get involved under this framework essentially indicates what? Traditional finance has already started to treat crypto as a viable business. What does this mean? Ordinary people outside the circle will find it easier to access crypto assets—after all, people who trust banks tend to trust them more than exchanges.

However, one key point must be understood here: what does "closed loop" mean? It means that the BTC or ETH you buy at KBC cannot be transferred out through the bank's account system. In other words, they are packaged by the bank as "digital wealth management products," not assets you truly own on the blockchain. This is different from free transfers and the truly decentralized crypto world. Financial institutions are essentially "bringing crypto assets into their fold," fitting them into the traditional financial framework. While risks are managed, the most valuable aspect of crypto—the "disintermediation"—disappears.

How will the market react? In the short term, the "compliance" narrative around BTC and ETH can attract attention, especially in Europe, where there may be a wave of sentiment follow-up. But in the long run, this "censored" service model, at its core, is just traditional finance using regulatory clothing to attract users, not a genuine embrace of the core logic of crypto.

For players already active on the chain, this kind of banking channel isn't very attractive—we want the freedom that comes with on-chain assets. But for newcomers who have never touched crypto, this could be a relatively gentle way to get started. Just remember to think clearly: do you want true ownership of crypto assets, or are you just getting a bank-packaged digital wealth management tool?
BTC-0,24%
ETH-0,5%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketMonkvip
· 18h ago
A closed loop is just fake crypto. To put it plainly, banks are still banks. Wrapping them in a compliant shell doesn't make us fools.
View OriginalReply0
SelfMadeRuggeevip
· 18h ago
This is how the closed-loop service works: the bank locks the coins, so how can it be true ownership of encrypted assets...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420vip
· 18h ago
This set of things from the bank is essentially "Bitcoin locked in a cage." Listening to compliance is actually a form of censorship. To put it simply, a closed loop means you can't extract anything, so what's the point of calling it encryption? It's fine for beginners, but who cares about this for seasoned players? What we want is that freedom from intermediaries, okay? This step with KBC, frankly, is just traditional finance using regulatory disguise to grab users, not genuine embrace of encryption. Compliance narratives may fool outsiders, but in the long run, this model is actually very cumbersome. Real ownership of encrypted assets and packaged digital financial tools are two different things, and this must be understood clearly. Short-term emotions will follow, but this is not the future direction of encryption.
View OriginalReply0
WalletManagervip
· 18h ago
A closed loop is a trap; only when you hold the genuine coins in your own wallet does it count.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicatorvip
· 18h ago
Is that it? The bank's "cryptocurrency" is still just a rebranded financial product in disguise.
View OriginalReply0
EthSandwichHerovip
· 18h ago
A closed loop is just a change of soup without changing the medicine; it's better to go to a DEX and play for real.
View OriginalReply0
SeasonedInvestorvip
· 18h ago
Basically, it's just selling financial products under a different guise, and the true essence of crypto has been completely stripped away. --- A closed loop is essentially a way to siphon funds; if you can't access your account, it's not really crypto. --- This move by the bank is just trying to push us back into traditional finance. Don't be fooled by the so-called "compliance" label. --- A gentle introduction for beginners? That's just being softly harvested like leeks. --- Short-term hype around compliant concepts, but in the long run, it depends on who still upholds on-chain freedom. --- The KBC incident is actually a delaying tactic by traditional finance; those who understand crypto logic won't buy into it. --- The difference is simple—you get either BTC or a BTC deposit certificate? --- Isn't this just the bank's version of "Do I have your private key?"? Laugh out loud. --- Europeans are about to be trapped, holding "digital financial products" and thinking they're trading coins. --- Old leeks all understand: if it's not your wallet, then it's not your coins.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)