Public chain financing amount ranking data is interesting. According to the latest statistics, EOS's fundraising scale is indeed far ahead in history, and this record is quite difficult to break.

Recently, I found that Tempo's financing ranking surprisingly ranked third, which is quite unexpected — even surpassing Solana's fundraising amount. This raises a question: how should we view the market capitalization expectations after Tempo's token launch?

Using financing amount to infer token market value, logically, Tempo does have some imagination space. But there is a key cognitive difference: high financing amount ≠ necessarily high market cap later. Solana's current market recognition and application ecosystem have already developed, and these cannot be achieved solely through financing amounts. For Tempo to truly surpass Solana's market cap, it depends on whether it can make breakthrough progress in practical applications and ecosystem development. In the short term, the probability isn't particularly high, but the imaginative space for new projects is still there.