2026-01-16 08:30:56

#数字资产市场动态 Ethereum just finished the 228th core developer meeting for the execution layer, and things got a bit complicated regarding EIP-7843—this proposal involves coordination issues between the consensus layer and the execution layer, so the testing of BALs Devnet-2 has been postponed. Seven EIPs ultimately did not make it into the Glamsterdam release, and instead, EIP-7954 became the main focus. This means the $ETH ecosystem's development pace will need to be adjusted again, mainly to ensure network stability and protocol reliability.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnChainDetective

· 10h ago

ngl, the coordination mess between consensus and execution layers is exactly the pattern we've seen before... suspicious activity detected in how these delays keep stacking up. based on historical data, devnet delays usually precede unexpected mainnet hiccups. watching eip-7954 pretty closely tbh, transaction patterns will tell us what's really happening here.

Reply0

LightningWallet

· 01-16 09:01

Starting to adjust the development pace again. When will the coordination issue between these two layers be resolved?

View OriginalReply0

GasSavingMaster

· 01-16 09:00

延期 again, these developers really know how to drag... Can EIP-7954 be more reliable this time? Really? None of the seven made it? It feels like the ETH ecosystem has been constantly adjusting its pace recently. Stability is important, but if this keeps dragging on, competitors will surpass us. Delay, delay, delay... When will it finally be implemented? Will this test go smoothly? Honestly, I'm a bit worried. Once again, coordination issues—there's bickering over at the consensus layer.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 01-16 08:54

228 meetings, 7 EIPs falling behind, such efficiency... we need to create a table to compare with historical data. 7954 is the new favorite, but the consensus layer is arguing again, a typical case of "delaying for stability"—in other words, they haven't figured out how to optimize the gas model yet.

View OriginalReply0