2026-01-16 08:31:31

BSC's recent actions indeed show sincerity. On one hand, the foundation directly invested 100 million USD to support the ecosystem. This isn't just talk; tangible financial input demonstrates their commitment. On the other hand, what's more interesting is that the foundation itself has started participating in Meme coin investments. Such bold moves are rare in traditional ecosystems.

How do you view these two strategies? Firstly, they reflect BSC's inclusive attitude toward ecosystem innovation. Although Meme coins are controversial, as carriers of community culture, they do promote user growth and market activity. Secondly, the large capital injection combined with the foundation's involvement can effectively bolster market confidence and provide incubation opportunities for quality projects.

However, the key still depends on what happens next. Money and hype are easy to generate; the difficult part is whether they can continue to inject real application value and ecological support into these projects. If it's merely a marketing stunt, the impact of this move will be significantly diminished. But if it serves as a foundation to attract more developers and users to participate in ecosystem building, BSC's competitiveness could further improve.

MEME3,21%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidityWizard

· 15h ago

Oops, the foundation is playing meme coins themselves? That's a bit bold—betting on whether the ecosystem can survive Spending 100 million USD, how long can it last? That's the real question Real money invested, at least it shows it's not just empty talk, but whether the momentum can keep up is the real test Using meme coins to drive user growth is indeed fine, but I'm worried it might end up as a tool for cutting leeks It depends on whether there are real projects to follow up; otherwise, once the hype fades, it's game over The foundation daring to join in is actually quite courageous from another perspective—traditional VCs wouldn't dare Application value is the key; pure hype definitely won't last long To surpass other public chains, BSC needs this kind of combo... but whether it succeeds depends on fate Sustainability is the real challenge; money burns fast

View OriginalReply0

GmGmNoGn

· 15h ago

One hundred million dollars invested, it really seems like they want to play a game. The foundation personally investing in meme tokens is indeed a bit ruthless, but don’t just look at the fireworks; the key is whether they can truly incubate something later on. Basically, it depends on what happens next; otherwise, it’s just another round of hype to cut the leeks. BSC’s approach is old-fashioned; capital injection can never match the true innovation of the ecosystem. However, it must be said that few foundations dare to invest in meme tokens, betting on community enthusiasm or ecosystem prospects. This move is just to stabilize market sentiment; the real test is in implementation. It seems BSC is betting on the long-term viability of meme coins. If the project has no value, it will ultimately die. Supporting the market? In the end, it’s all about who can survive longer. The ecosystem needs to be sustainable to be truly capable; just throwing money around anyone can do. The foundation’s involvement in investment indeed breaks the norm, but whether it works depends on whether the market is willing to buy in.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropATM

· 15h ago

$100 million sounds good, but how much of it can actually be implemented? Let's wait and see. Meme coins do have some imagination, but I'm just worried it might be another flash in the pan. Speaking of which, even the foundation has started playing with Meme coins. Are they making money or losing money? Haha. Eco-support is the real key; burning money is easy, but creating real applications is too difficult. I'm just afraid this will turn into another prelude to a wave of profit-taking. However, BSC's boldness is indeed impressive. Funds are coming in, but the key is whether they can retain developers. That's the real hardcore challenge. How much of a boost can hype and packaging give? In the end, it all depends on on-chain activity data. Having money is great; just pour it into the ecosystem. We small investors can only watch the excitement. But if you ask me, instead of burning money, lowering gas fees would be more attractive. This time, they've made a firm decision, but I don't know how the foundation's Meme investments will finally turn out.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 15h ago

One hundred million dollars is indeed a hefty amount, but I'm still a bit skeptical about Meme coins. How many projects can truly settle and establish themselves? Wait, the foundation is also playing with Meme? That’s a bold move, but you’re right, the key is what happens next. No matter how loud the hype, without real application value, it’s all pointless. Let’s just see if they can actually retain users. I didn’t expect the foundation to participate in Meme investments. I wonder if they’re just trying to support some of their own projects? I believe in the injection of funds, but can it be sustained? That’s what I want to know, or else it’s just another wave of rug pulls. One hundred million dollars sounds like a lot, but how much actually reaches quality projects? I’m curious about the allocation plan. Ultimately, it still depends on execution. Many projects just put on a show in the early stages, but truly building an ecosystem is rare. Being tolerant of Meme coins shows more sincerity compared to other chains, but whether most of this investment will end up in the hands of a few big players is hard to say. The foundation getting involved in Meme—what is it trying to tell us? Or does it mean BSC is really starting to value community voice?

View OriginalReply0