#Strategy加仓BTC Meme coins have been really competitive lately. Several hot coins in the market are competing with each other—some surge on short-term hype and then plunge, while others are trying to carve out a different path.
The Conan project is quite interesting. It’s not just pure hype; it’s genuinely building on the Solana ecosystem—NFT issuance, token swaps, and other features are in the planning stages. More importantly, the team has directly relinquished control, destroyed 19.5% of the tokens, and implemented fully decentralized governance. This mechanism design fundamentally avoids the common rug risks.
In comparison, a major exchange’s popular related tokens once reached a market cap of $190 million, but after the initial hype was realized, they plummeted; another token that surged 400% on hype has also fallen back significantly. These are typical emotional-driven moves—crazy when rising, equally crazy when falling.
Conan is taking a different approach. In three months, the number of addresses holding the token has increased by 170%, showing a clear difference in community engagement. They also emphasize a "Finance + Public Welfare" differentiation, with a clear roadmap for CEX listing in progress. It seems they’re not betting on short-term price fluctuations but aiming to build a truly ecosystem-based project.
Compared to those purely traffic-driven tokens, projects like this are indeed more resilient to tests.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LazyDevMiner
· 14h ago
Burn 19.5% of tokens? I've seen too many fake tricks like this before. The key is whether they can truly build something afterward.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-40edb63b
· 14h ago
But to be honest, decentralized governance sounds appealing, but can it really prevent rug pulls? Or does it all depend on whether something substantial can actually be developed later on?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobber
· 14h ago
Burning tokens and decentralization sound good, but the real test is still to come.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 14h ago
Decentralized governance sounds good, but I still want to see how it performs after half a year.
View OriginalReply0
ApyWhisperer
· 14h ago
To be honest, truly impactful projects are indeed scarce. Most meme coins are just storytelling to harvest retail investors.
#Strategy加仓BTC Meme coins have been really competitive lately. Several hot coins in the market are competing with each other—some surge on short-term hype and then plunge, while others are trying to carve out a different path.
The Conan project is quite interesting. It’s not just pure hype; it’s genuinely building on the Solana ecosystem—NFT issuance, token swaps, and other features are in the planning stages. More importantly, the team has directly relinquished control, destroyed 19.5% of the tokens, and implemented fully decentralized governance. This mechanism design fundamentally avoids the common rug risks.
In comparison, a major exchange’s popular related tokens once reached a market cap of $190 million, but after the initial hype was realized, they plummeted; another token that surged 400% on hype has also fallen back significantly. These are typical emotional-driven moves—crazy when rising, equally crazy when falling.
Conan is taking a different approach. In three months, the number of addresses holding the token has increased by 170%, showing a clear difference in community engagement. They also emphasize a "Finance + Public Welfare" differentiation, with a clear roadmap for CEX listing in progress. It seems they’re not betting on short-term price fluctuations but aiming to build a truly ecosystem-based project.
Compared to those purely traffic-driven tokens, projects like this are indeed more resilient to tests.