Belarusian President Lukashenko signed Decree No. 19 today, officially allowing the establishment of cryptocurrency banks. This means the country becomes one of the few to provide a clear legal framework for crypto financial institutions. According to the decree, a cryptocurrency bank is a joint-stock company authorized to conduct business using digital tokens, while also engaging in banking, payment, and other financial operations. This policy marks a strategic shift for Belarus in the crypto sector.
Policy Core Content Analysis
Legal Definition of Crypto Banks
According to the decree, a cryptocurrency bank must meet the following characteristics:
Form of a joint-stock company
Authorized to conduct business using digital tokens
Simultaneously perform banking, payment, and other related financial operations
This definition integrates crypto activities with traditional financial services, reflecting regulatory recognition of financial innovation
Entry and Operational Requirements
Requirement Category
Specific Details
Identity Requirement
Must be a high-tech park resident enterprise
Registration Requirement
Listed on the national bank’s crypto bank registration list
Regulatory Compliance
Comply with regulations applicable to non-bank credit financial institutions
Regulatory Enforcement
Implement decisions of the High-Tech Park Supervisory Board
This framework indicates that Belarus adopts a relatively open yet orderly regulatory approach, allowing innovation while maintaining necessary risk controls.
Strategic Significance of the Policy
National-Level Layout
Belarusian officials stated that the decree aims to strengthen the country’s image as a leader in financial information technology. This is not just a crypto policy but an important part of the national digital economy strategy. By providing a compliant framework for crypto banks, Belarus seeks to attract global crypto enterprises and talent inflow.
Market Competition Perspective
In the global crypto regulatory landscape, most countries adopt conservative or confrontational stances. Belarus’s move makes it one of the few countries explicitly recognizing crypto financial institutions, potentially gaining a first-mover advantage in international competition. This is similar to El Salvador’s early embrace of Bitcoin, which drew international attention to the country.
Potential Market Impact
Based on this policy framework, possible development directions include:
Global crypto enterprises may evaluate the feasibility of establishing crypto banks in Belarus
The country’s high-tech parks could become new hubs for crypto finance
Other Eastern European countries might follow with similar policies
Successful operation of crypto banks could serve as a reference case for other nations
Summary
Belarus’s decree represents an important policy signal: crypto finance is moving from the fringe to the mainstream financial system. By clearly defining crypto banks, setting entry conditions, and establishing a regulatory framework, Belarus has created a relatively mature compliant environment. This is a positive signal for the global crypto industry, indicating that more countries are considering how to incorporate crypto assets and blockchain technology into formal financial systems rather than simply banning or ignoring them. The key going forward is how this policy is implemented in practice and whether it can attract genuine financial institutions to participate.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Belarus officially recognizes crypto banks, Eastern European countries accelerate embracing blockchain finance
Belarusian President Lukashenko signed Decree No. 19 today, officially allowing the establishment of cryptocurrency banks. This means the country becomes one of the few to provide a clear legal framework for crypto financial institutions. According to the decree, a cryptocurrency bank is a joint-stock company authorized to conduct business using digital tokens, while also engaging in banking, payment, and other financial operations. This policy marks a strategic shift for Belarus in the crypto sector.
Policy Core Content Analysis
Legal Definition of Crypto Banks
According to the decree, a cryptocurrency bank must meet the following characteristics:
Entry and Operational Requirements
This framework indicates that Belarus adopts a relatively open yet orderly regulatory approach, allowing innovation while maintaining necessary risk controls.
Strategic Significance of the Policy
National-Level Layout
Belarusian officials stated that the decree aims to strengthen the country’s image as a leader in financial information technology. This is not just a crypto policy but an important part of the national digital economy strategy. By providing a compliant framework for crypto banks, Belarus seeks to attract global crypto enterprises and talent inflow.
Market Competition Perspective
In the global crypto regulatory landscape, most countries adopt conservative or confrontational stances. Belarus’s move makes it one of the few countries explicitly recognizing crypto financial institutions, potentially gaining a first-mover advantage in international competition. This is similar to El Salvador’s early embrace of Bitcoin, which drew international attention to the country.
Potential Market Impact
Based on this policy framework, possible development directions include:
Summary
Belarus’s decree represents an important policy signal: crypto finance is moving from the fringe to the mainstream financial system. By clearly defining crypto banks, setting entry conditions, and establishing a regulatory framework, Belarus has created a relatively mature compliant environment. This is a positive signal for the global crypto industry, indicating that more countries are considering how to incorporate crypto assets and blockchain technology into formal financial systems rather than simply banning or ignoring them. The key going forward is how this policy is implemented in practice and whether it can attract genuine financial institutions to participate.