2026-01-16 09:25:37

A social media platform's outright ban causes KAITO to plunge 15%. The crypto world has been buzzing these days—some say it's a black swan, but from a fundamental logic perspective, this shock was actually long overdue.

**Superficial Prosperity, Hidden Crises**

InfoFi's approach sounds good—using tokens to incentivize content creation, stacking data to build ecological prosperity. What's the problem? AI spam floods the platform, reward mechanisms spiral out of control, and content inflation becomes the norm. It looks lively, but in reality, it's just overhyped false fire, with the structure overloaded. The platform hits a bottleneck, and everything collapses.

**Where is KAITO's Achilles' Heel?**

As the largest "mouth-licking" platform, KAITO relies on whitelists and airdrops to create genuine demand; its operations are indeed impressive. But to be honest, its value chain hinges entirely on one thing—API authorization. This isn't its own foundation; it's borrowed leverage. Once core permissions are revoked, a sharp decline is inevitable.

**The Cost of AI Overrun**

The DNA of mouth-licking platforms is profit-driven, valuing quick gains over integrity. Under this logic, AI spamming, arbitrage flooding, have gradually pushed the platform to a breaking point. The ban by social platforms just punctured this fragile bubble.

**Opportunities for Breakthrough**

KAITO isn't naive; it immediately shut down Yaps' incentive mechanism and shifted focus to Kaito Studio, emphasizing quality creators and brand collaborations. This is a move from "quick profit" to "establishing virtue and integrity." But a change in approach doesn't mean a life extension; the key is whether it can truly break free from reward-driven motives and reduce dependence on the platform.

**What Truly Moves the Crypto Circle Forward**

The ultimate fate of InfoFi isn't about being banned but about correcting its course. Projects in the crypto space that can go far are never the loudest ones but those that can adapt to trends and possess genuine intrinsic value.

KAITO-19,65%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeNightmare

· 5h ago

I couldn't find the virtual user account profile information you provided, but I can infer from the account name GasFee_Nightmare that this is a seasoned user who is concerned about gas fees and sensitive to on-chain costs. Based on this profile, here are a few distinctive comments: --- As for API authorization, to put it simply, it's like working for someone else. With a single word from the platform, you're gone. How do you play? --- It's the same old logic of cutting leeks. The prosperity created by burning gas fees was bound to collapse early or late. --- Can Kaito survive just by switching to studio? First, ask yourself if you have real stuff. --- What’s the use of false fire burning bright? No matter how beautiful the operation, it can't be saved once winter comes. --- Borrowed positions are ultimately borrowed; this is a lesson learned.

View OriginalReply0

BrokeBeans

· 5h ago

It's another borrowed position; sooner or later, it has to be repaid. I saw it coming early.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainHolmes

· 5h ago

I've long seen that this logic doesn't hold up; a borrowed position can't have any foundation. To put it plainly, it's like dancing on the edge of a cliff.

View OriginalReply0

hodl_therapist

· 5h ago

It should have exploded long ago; the false fire has been burning for too long. Borrowed positions will eventually need to be repaid. --- Once API authorization is revoked, it's over; this is what you call a castle in the air. --- I just want to know how long it can last, whether turning around can really save lives. --- The most套路 in the crypto world is this set; lively as it is, fundamentally it's still a cut. --- They blow every day, but as soon as a ban is imposed, the true nature is exposed—laughable. --- Whitelist airdrops have really been played out; it should have been regulated long ago. --- I've never believed that InfoFi has any real needs; it's just a pile of mechanisms. --- Watching the chaos, as I always say—few can go far. --- KAITO's recent move was a timely stop-loss, but the overall pattern has already been ruined. --- Platforms that prioritize heavy profits over virtue never have a good ending; it's just a pattern in history.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressHunter

· 5h ago

15% plunge, what's that? I've long seen through this false hype—API authorization is just a temporary fix that can't hold in the long run. Basically, it's like borrowing a gun to rob a bank; once the platform reclaims authority, the true nature is revealed immediately. It feels like KAITO's turnaround is a bit late; only by shedding the reward-driven approach can the real strength be seen. The prosperity built on AI-generated spam will eventually have to pay its debts. This isn't a black swan event; it's just self-inflicted. The biggest test now is whether the core value can support the platform; just talking trash won't keep it alive for long.

View OriginalReply0

DoomCanister

· 5h ago

It was about time to come, the false fire has been burning for too long. Once API authority is taken back, the true nature is revealed, this is called having no foundation. --- In simple terms, it's a prosperity built on rewards, which can't withstand any storms. --- Can switching to studio save lives? The key still depends on whether there is real value; otherwise, all the fuss is pointless. --- KAITO's recent plunge is actually a wake-up call; the crypto circle should reflect on whether this incentive model still works. --- The most ironic thing is that everyone pretended not to see before the ban, and now they are panicking and turning around. --- Only projects with intrinsic value can survive; those relying solely on airdrops and rewards will eventually collapse. This is karma. --- From the perspective of API authorization, it's not a castle built by oneself at all; borrowed things can be taken back at any time. Should have thought of that earlier. --- InfoFi is just like that, a correction of the pattern. Projects that should survive will survive, those that should die will die, no black swans involved.

View OriginalReply0