2026-01-16 09:27:17

As a core participant in the community project, I've recently been pondering a question: How can we truly transform these unique NFT holders into influential content creators?

This is not just about slogans. If you hold the project's PFP and have genuine passion for content creation, it's worth our time to engage, learn, and collaborate.

What exactly can be done? Sharing creation experiences, participating in community feedback, helping to spread quality content—these are all feasible paths. The key is to establish a cycle: holders produce content, the community provides feedback and support, and high-quality creators gain more opportunities and resources.

Such an ecosystem benefits everyone. Creators find a stage, the community gains richer narratives, and the project becomes more active. It's worth a try.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainRetirementHome

· 12h ago

Ha, it's the same narrative again. Holding a PFP makes you a creator? I think 99% are still just lying flat and collecting rent.

View OriginalReply0

QuorumVoter

· 16h ago

I think this idea is good, but how practical is it? Can it really activate all the holders? --- Once again, it's the content creator approach. It feels a bit like just painting a cake. --- I'm interested in the circular ecosystem, but there needs to be real financial incentives. --- NGL, I'm just worried that in the end, only a few active creators will produce content, and others will just watch. --- The stage is ready, but what about resources? That's the key. --- I agree with this direction. The key is whether community feedback can truly help creators. --- It sounds ideal, but the question is how long it can be sustained. --- PFP holders are already diverse; how can we ensure content quality? --- I agree with this idea. Now it's just about how to execute it moving forward. --- It's worth trying, at least it's better than the current zombie projects.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPhoenix

· 16h ago

Honestly, I've heard this logic too many times. Every time, it's about building an ecosystem, creating a cycle, empowering... and what’s the result? Most holders are still just thinking about the price going back up, haha. But your approach is indeed a bit different. Not many projects seriously want to develop content. The key is that someone really has to be willing to settle down and do the work, rather than just shouting slogans and calling it a day. In a bear market, those who can persist in creating content are the real chips to survive the cycle. Wait, is this about truly supporting creators with real money, or mainly verbal encouragement? That’s the key. Alright, let’s have some faith. Let’s see how you guys implement this. The opportunity is at the bottom range. Okay, this is indeed worth trying. At least it’s better than just chatting about prices in the group every day.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 16h ago

Hmm... that logic sounds good, but let me see the data support. What is the actual conversion rate of holders turning into creators usually?

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 16h ago

To be honest, I've heard this logic too many times. The key is really to have resources poured in; otherwise, it's all just empty talk. Thinking of holding a PFP as a creator? Let's first pass the community check; feedback often comes faster than support. A true cycle requires incentives; just shouting "Let's do it together" isn't enough. This idea is good, but how about execution? Will it just turn into a few active individuals' self-entertainment? Instead of talking about conversions, it's better to see how many current holders actually want to create.

View OriginalReply0

SquidTeacher

· 16h ago

Sounds good, but how many can actually stick to it when it comes to real execution? --- It's easy to say that holders become creators, but the key is genuine financial incentives. --- It's a bit idealistic, but I like this idea. --- Anyway, since there's no loss, might as well give it a try. --- The key is quality screening, otherwise it will just turn into a flood of trash content. --- This cycle needs someone to lead the way, or it will just be an illusion. --- So ultimately, real incentives are necessary, not just verbal encouragement. --- It looks great, but how about in actual operation? Community feedback is the easiest part to become superficial. --- I think it's worth trying, but there must be a clear evaluation mechanism. --- It sounds impressive, but the problem is, what if bad money drives out good? --- The premise is that the project itself has to be popular; otherwise, the stage is wasted.

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 16h ago

This process sounds good, but how many people can really stick to producing content? I like this idea, but I'm worried it will end up being just another empty project. There really needs to be a feedback mechanism, or else creators will eventually lose their enthusiasm. Hey, is anyone here seriously creating content? Let's chat together. If we keep going like this, the community can indeed stay alive, but the key is not to become just another way to cut leeks. Holders produce content, the community supports... easy to say, but execution depends on sincerity. Nodding vigorously, but the premise is that the project team must truly invest resources, not just talk about it on paper. I just want to see who will be the first to step up and seriously become a creator. Once this cycle gets going, it can definitely bring some new ideas, but right now, there are really few serious projects like this in Web3.

View OriginalReply0