Suppose you manage a European private equity fund with several hundred million euros in unlisted equity and real estate assets on the books. The idea is simple: break these assets into smaller pieces to allow more qualified investors to participate in the transactions. But reality throws two tough problems.



First, transactions must be kept confidential. Competitors shouldn't be able to peek at your holdings changes, pricing strategies, or even on-chain spectators guessing what assets you're moving.

Second, regulators could show up at any time for audits. Anti-money laundering checks and compliance proofs need to be produced instantly, but without revealing sensitive information.

For a long time, this has been a deadlock—privacy and transparency are like fish and bear paws.

Until a different approach emerged. Instead of treating zero-knowledge proofs as a万能 tool, it's better to cut precisely like a surgeon: use ZK technology where privacy is needed, enforce transparency where necessary, and leave verifiable anchors at compliance checkpoints. This "differentiated privacy" design allows institutions to confidently put real securities on-chain while complying with frameworks like MiCA.

The most noticeable change is in process compression. Previously, RWA issuance required lawyers, custodians, and countless intermediaries with layered approvals. Now, it can be done in just a few steps on-chain. The issuer handles it with privacy smart contracts, auditors see only the necessary data, and investors receive compliance proofs—each gets what they need without redundancy. When the mainnet launches by the end of 2025, this model will truly move from concept to practical operation.
RWA7,08%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenCreatorOPvip
· 5h ago
Wow, this is what true Web3 should be about. The differential privacy logic is amazing.
View OriginalReply0
ILCollectorvip
· 5h ago
It's both ZK and differential privacy, sounds quite advanced, but whether it will be practically implemented by the end of 2025 depends on how things turn out. Institutions have long wanted this kind of approach; the key is whether regulators will buy into it.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessApevip
· 5h ago
Oh wow, someone finally reconciled the pair of rivals, privacy and compliance. Not bad, not bad.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreetsvip
· 5h ago
It's both ZK and privacy anchors. Basically, institutions want to remain anonymous while passing audits—a typical fish and bear's paw fantasy... But this time, there's actually something substantial. The differentiated privacy trick is brilliant, like finding a balance between two opposing trading counterparts. Wait, the real acid test is the end of 2025—whether it can truly be implemented from "a few on-chain steps," rather than just becoming another PPT revolution. RWA sounds easy to do but is actually difficult to implement. Intermediaries aren't just eating for free either. Once this system is truly launched, lawyers might be left out in the cold...
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorkervip
· 5h ago
Overthinking a bit, balancing privacy and transparency is easy to talk about, but how does it work in practice?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)