2026-01-16 09:30:24

#Strategy加仓BTC The crucial barrier of $BTC at 94400-94700! This is today’s life-and-death line; whether it can hold depends on this.

Yesterday, it surged straight to 98000 but was ruthlessly pushed down, rebounding 1400 points near 95700. The current question is simple: continue to push higher or completely collapse? My judgment is—94400-94700 cannot hold, and the 98000 rally will hit the ceiling, with the bulls basically out of the game. But what if it stabilizes here? First, see if the 96800 resistance can be broken, then keep an eye on 98000, and afterward aim directly for the 100,000 mark.

For traders looking to buy the dip and rebound, this position indeed offers an opportunity. But there's a prerequisite: you must see clear signs of a trend reversal before entering, don’t blindly go all-in. Personally, I think the bulls still have a chance; next, it will either oscillate at high levels for a while or surge directly.

Anyway, the key levels that need marking have already been marked; it all depends on whether it can hold this line today.

BTC-0,07%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CommunityJanitor

· 7h ago

If this line at 94,700 doesn't break, I won't believe the bulls are truly dead. Yesterday's plunge was too fierce. At 94,400, if there's no rebound, it's time to run; otherwise, you'll really get caught. The 100,000 target... it's still too early to talk about now. First, get past 96,800 before bragging. All-in players are just newbies; it's not too late to wait for a clear signal before entering. Anyway, today it's all about this line. If it's broken, the bears will dominate.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 13h ago

94700, if you really can't hold this key level, the bulls are truly finished. If 94400 can hold, I'll eat a chicken leg; if not, I'll keep watching the show. All-in players are brave; I only dare to eat the meat of the stop-loss signals. It's another life-and-death line; I'm used to these daily life-and-death lines, haha. If 96800 can't be broken, don't even think about 98000. Be more realistic, everyone. If this wave really pushes to 100,000, I'll directly do a handstand and take a dump. Are the bulls still hopeful? Wake up, brothers, look at the candlestick chart. A rebound of 1400 points and expecting a turnaround? That's too naive. I bet 94700 can't be defended; who wants to bet against me? Hold this line to keep playing; if it's broken, go back to sleep.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTaxonomist

· 13h ago

so let me pull up my spreadsheet real quick... 94400-94700 as a "life or death" line? statistically speaking, that's just volatility expressing its natural ecosystem behavior. nothing taxonomically incorrect about the bounce structure though, ngl the phylogenetic chart on this price action is actually kind of clean.

Reply0

GovernancePretender

· 13h ago

94400 here is really the life and death line, I bet it holds No way, are we crashing again? Yesterday it was taken down at 98,000, and today you want to push higher? 100,000 yuan is indeed tempting, but I don't think the bulls necessarily have a chance Let's wait for a clear reversal signal, don't rush in blindly Can 96800 break? I think it's uncertain

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterNoLoss

· 13h ago

If this 94,700 level breaks, I'll admit defeat and exit, no more psychological games. Wait, can this wave really push to 100,000? Feels a bit too optimistic. Yesterday's plunge to 98,000 was quite fierce for the bears; let's see if they can turn it around today. I just want to ask, is there still hope if the support breaks? Or should I just liquidate everything and run? How tough must it be for those going all-in... holding on at the critical point was all for nothing. Is this a rebound or a real crash? That's the real question.

View OriginalReply0