The bottleneck in Web3 has shifted. Execution? That's no longer where the real challenge sits. What matters now is stateless intelligence.
This perspective challenges how most builders are thinking about agents right now. Agents without memory hit a wall—they can't learn, can't improve, can't genuinely reason over time. But here's where it gets interesting: provenance becomes critical. You need to know where your data came from, what it means, and whether it's trustworthy.
The implication is stark. We're moving from an era of "can we compute it?" to "do we understand what we're computing with?" That's a fundamentally different game for Web3 development.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ConsensusDissenter
· 4h ago
Ah, here we go again, talking about stateless intelligence, but the agents actually in use are still stuck there.
---
Data provenance is indeed an issue, but Web3 folks haven't figured out how to store this stuff yet.
---
From "Can it be calculated" to "Does it matter what we're calculating"... sounds good, but I don't know who is actually doing it.
---
Memoryless agents are inherently a pseudo-need; changing the name is like discovering a new continent.
---
Provenance is important, but the question is, who will bear the cost?
---
Another round of hype, I think. The real bottleneck is still the economic model.
View OriginalReply0
PumpStrategist
· 4h ago
Stateless intelligence? Sounds good, but I'm more concerned about the implementation costs of data traceability. The form has already taken shape, and the next hot spot is right here; the distribution of chips has long been revealed. Most people are still debating "whether it can be calculated," unaware that the real profits have already been locked in by those who understand "what to use for calculation." This is a typical information gap arbitrage, and the probabilistic strategy should have been adjusted long ago.
View OriginalReply0
wagmi_eventually
· 4h ago
Well said, the issue of data traceability has indeed been overlooked for too long. In the past, everyone was focused on performance, and only now do we realize that trust is the core—how ironic.
---
Stateless smart contracts sound impressive, but essentially it's an issue of information quality—garbage in, garbage out.
---
So basically, we need to open the black box and stop pretending to be mysterious.
---
An agent with no memory is just a vase, that must be acknowledged. But who bears the cost of traceability?
---
From the war of computing power to the war of trust, Web3 has finally had its epiphany.
---
Ha, you just realized that? I've been pondering this for a long time.
---
Not all data is trustworthy; that's the real bottleneck.
View OriginalReply0
OneBlockAtATime
· 4h ago
That's so true, data traceability is indeed an overlooked pain point.
The bottleneck in Web3 has shifted. Execution? That's no longer where the real challenge sits. What matters now is stateless intelligence.
This perspective challenges how most builders are thinking about agents right now. Agents without memory hit a wall—they can't learn, can't improve, can't genuinely reason over time. But here's where it gets interesting: provenance becomes critical. You need to know where your data came from, what it means, and whether it's trustworthy.
The implication is stark. We're moving from an era of "can we compute it?" to "do we understand what we're computing with?" That's a fundamentally different game for Web3 development.