2026-01-16 17:28:03

Time to reshape how we build ambassador programs in Web3. Current initiatives often lack real incentive alignment and transparent metrics. What if projects focused on genuine community advocates instead of vanity metrics? Better selection criteria, meaningful compensation tied to actual contribution, and clear program governance. The strongest Web3 communities aren't built on volume—they're built on authentic ambassadors who actually believe in the ecosystem. Let's demand better standards.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DAOdreamer

· 5h ago

Exactly right. The current ambassador program is just a bunch of number games—whoever has more fans gets to be on, but in the end, nothing gets done.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBarbecue

· 11h ago

To be honest, most ambassador programs these days are just a joke, gathering a bunch of followers and boosting the hype.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyMiner

· 11h ago

Honestly, the ambassador program is just a joke now; it's all about data faking.

View OriginalReply0

SleepyValidator

· 11h ago

That's so true. Most ambassador programs nowadays are just fake, all they do is inflate the numbers.

View OriginalReply0

WalletManager

· 11h ago

The current ambassador program is just a collection of vanity metrics, such as follower count and retweets—meaningless stuff. What truly matters are on-chain contribution and holding period; only these can reflect genuine intent.

View OriginalReply0

NFTregretter

· 12h ago

Honestly, the ambassador program is just a joke now, full of scammers and frauds.

View OriginalReply0