Artificial intelligence doesn't have borders—so why should the infrastructure behind it? The real bottleneck isn't computing power or algorithms anymore. It's data architecture.



What we actually need is a permissionless data foundation that lets anyone contribute, regardless of geography or institutional backing. Think about it: the world's best training data isn't locked in Silicon Valley labs. It's everywhere. In local datasets, community insights, regional context that no centralized system will ever capture.

Blockchain-based data layers solve this by design. They enable transparent provenance tracking, where every contribution is verifiable and immutable. Borders become irrelevant when code doesn't care about jurisdiction. This is how AI actually becomes global—not by importing data into existing silos, but by building infrastructure that distributes intelligence across the world.

The next wave of AI won't be owned by any single entity. It'll be built by whoever has valuable data and the tools to monetize it directly.
IMX8,07%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ETHReserveBankvip
· 5h ago
Sounds good, but I still have some doubts... Can it truly be decentralized? Speaking of which, data is indeed key, but who guarantees its quality? Blockchain sounds wonderful, but in reality, there are still people in charge. Removing middlemen and exploitation, just listen to the stories; actually implementing it is much harder than talking about it. Permissionless sounds appealing, but I'm worried that ultimately power will still be concentrated... But the idea is quite right; the data barriers should be broken.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-3824aa38vip
· 6h ago
That's right, data is the real gold mine. The centralized approach of Silicon Valley should have gone bankrupt long ago. The permissionless setup is indeed exciting; anyone can contribute and earn, but the problem is that most people simply don't have "valuable data," so rules still need to be set by the top players. Decentralization sounds good, but in the end, isn't it still the powerful who win? Blockchain support can't change that. Regionalized data is indeed being wasted; local contextual insights are hardly utilized, so there's definitely an opportunity there. However, it will probably take several more years to fully realize this, as the infrastructure is still too poor.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 6h ago
Sounds good, but who will guarantee data quality? With open permission thresholds, garbage data can also be uploaded to the chain, right?
View OriginalReply0
GasWastervip
· 6h ago
ngl the gas fees to bridge all this decentralized data would absolutely destroy the whole "permissionless" vibe... anyone actually run the numbers on settlement costs?
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)