It'd be worth considering a failover mechanism that incorporates state root verification against mithril. Essentially, if 2 out of 3 clients can agree on and validate the state root through mithril, then the failover can proceed with confidence. This creates a more robust consensus layer—clients cross-verify critical state data before executing any transition, which adds an extra security checkpoint. The redundancy ensures no single client failure jeopardizes the system's integrity.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DYORMastervip
· 7h ago
Mithril's verification mechanism sounds good, but can it really be implemented? It feels like just a theoretical plan.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidatedvip
· 7h ago
This Mithril scheme sounds pretty good. The 2/3 consensus can indeed provide a solid foundation, but it adds an extra verification step. Will the gas fees spike again?
View OriginalReply0
just_here_for_vibesvip
· 8h ago
Nah, this 2/3 verification sounds good, but in practice, will it be another story... Is Mithril really reliable?
View OriginalReply0
UncleLiquidationvip
· 8h ago
NGL, this 2/3 consensus validation is indeed tough, but is Mithril really stable on the mainnet...
View OriginalReply0
RunWhenCutvip
· 8h ago
ngl, this 2/3 validation setup is indeed awesome. The combination of mithril + state root can really plug many vulnerabilities.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)