2026-01-16 23:25:17

A major TOKABU holder has just scooped up $5.04K worth of RALPH tokens at a $39.98M market cap valuation. The move signals continued activity among large traders in these emerging altcoin plays.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StablecoinGuardian

· 2h ago

5.04K bought RALPH? Are the big players bottoming out or cutting losses? The 39.98M market cap seems a bit shaky.

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdvice

· 2h ago

NGL Ralph, if this coin takes off, I will turn my situation around... Major investors are all buying the dip.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller69

· 2h ago

Wow, is this another small coin manipulation? Do big investors really dare to buy anything?

View OriginalReply0

WalletDetective

· 2h ago

Look here, the big players are buying RALPH again... To be honest, I've seen quite a few small-scale dips like this, but where is the real signal?

View OriginalReply0

PebbleHander

· 2h ago

Playing with new coins again, these big players really know how to stir things up.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 3h ago

Wait a minute, this transaction is quite interesting... According to on-chain data, a large TOKABU holder is turning around to sweep RALPH? $5.04K may not seem like much, but the key question is—why did they choose to act at the $39.98M valuation point? Through multi-address tracking, this transaction pattern is extremely unusual. Obvious fund correlation, a typical large holder testing the waters. It's not real money being deployed, more like testing market depth... I had already guessed this, as such new tokens are often exploited in this way.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMasked

· 3h ago

The big players are starting to play tricks again. Ralph, with such a small pot, still dares to enter...

View OriginalReply0