2026-01-17 00:44:29

How do you see this supply reduction proposal for CAKE? The shift from 450M to 400M tokens could reshape tokenomics significantly. Would this move strengthen holder value, or are there concerns about the mechanics behind it? Curious what the community thinks about the trade-offs here.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CommunityLurker

· 4h ago

Reducing 50 million tokens sounds good, but the key is how and when to do it... Can it really boost the market?

View OriginalReply0

TokenDustCollector

· 4h ago

It sounds like just another scheme to harvest retail investors... The tactic of reducing circulation has been overused, and in the end, it just leads to a dump.

View OriginalReply0

GweiTooHigh

· 4h ago

ngl this crappy proposal is just another scam to cut profits, 450M to 400M sounds good but there are definitely pitfalls in the mechanism, I've seen through these tokenomics tricks a long time ago.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainGossiper

· 4h ago

NGL, this supply reduction proposal sounds good, but it doesn't seem that simple... The real key is how to execute it afterward, otherwise it's no different from cutting the leeks.

View OriginalReply0

RugDocDetective

· 4h ago

Reducing 50 million tokens sounds like a lot, but it depends on how the burn mechanism is implemented; otherwise, it's just a paper exercise.

View OriginalReply0

quiet_lurker

· 4h ago

To be honest, reducing 50 million tokens sounds like a lot, but the key is how they are burned. If it's just talk and not practically implemented, then it's a joke.

View OriginalReply0