Some investors are currently viewing certain assets as dead money until key catalysts materialize. The focus seems to be on tracking specific data points and launch timelines. There's particular interest in how downstream beneficiaries will perform—companies in the industrial and defense sectors like Lockheed Martin and Boeing could see meaningful implications depending on how these developments unfold. It's a thesis that ties market movements to broader macro catalysts rather than immediate token fundamentals.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedThrice
· 11h ago
Wait, the "dead money" theory is coming up again? I just want to know what catalyst these people are waiting for; they haven't even waited for a single thing.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivor
· 11h ago
Wait, this logic doesn't add up... treating tokens as dead money and catalysts? It just feels like gambling on the macro, what about the real value?
View OriginalReply0
OffchainWinner
· 11h ago
Wait, will LMT and BA really take off? Feels like this logic is a bit far-fetched...
View OriginalReply0
MagicBean
· 11h ago
Dead money as a catalyst? Haha, LMT and Boeing are making some noise over there.
Some investors are currently viewing certain assets as dead money until key catalysts materialize. The focus seems to be on tracking specific data points and launch timelines. There's particular interest in how downstream beneficiaries will perform—companies in the industrial and defense sectors like Lockheed Martin and Boeing could see meaningful implications depending on how these developments unfold. It's a thesis that ties market movements to broader macro catalysts rather than immediate token fundamentals.