2026-01-17 04:42:15

These kinds of arguments are popping up again, and it all feels so familiar. A few years ago, before Luna exploded, similar voices and logic flooded social media. It's hard to deny that the crypto market loves to repeat the same script at cycle points—new project teams, new promises, new believers—but the套路 is often the same. Maybe it's time to look more at history and be less fooled by new buzzwords.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForumMiningMaster

· 3h ago

It's the same old trick again, someone always falls for it every time.

View OriginalReply0

Lonely_Validator

· 3h ago

It's the same set of talking points again; I've heard it during the Luna period once already.

View OriginalReply0

Layer3Dreamer

· 3h ago

theoretically speaking, if we map luna's collapse onto our current state vector using recursive historical analysis... the pattern recognition here is undeniable. it's like watching the same zero-knowledge proof get verified across multiple rollups, just with different variable names.

Reply0

down_only_larry

· 3h ago

Damn, it's starting again. The tricks really haven't changed.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMaster

· 3h ago

Ha, it's the same old trick again. I watched Luna's wave and was blown away. The same story with a different shell can still fool a new batch of inexperienced investors.

View OriginalReply0

GweiTooHigh

· 3h ago

Damn it, here we go again. Luna has already blown up, and there are still people falling for the same scam.

View OriginalReply0

wrekt_but_learning