2026-01-17 12:39:14

A certain cryptocurrency project's developer is known for frequently launching high-stakes operations, keeping the market hot. When the price reaches the critical level of 600, many investors begin to pay attention to this asset.

For participation in the project, technical analysis is particularly important. Using Fibonacci sequence for buy and sell point analysis has become a common strategy in the crypto market—identifying potential support and resistance levels through the golden ratio. This method helps traders find relatively ideal entry and take-profit points amid price fluctuations.

Specifically, when the project's price fluctuates within a certain range, Fibonacci retracement levels such as 0.618 and 0.382 can be used to predict the next possible turning point. When combined with other technical indicators, it can improve the success rate of decision-making.

However, it is important to remember that any single analysis method has its limitations. The crypto market involves both risks and opportunities, and thorough research and risk assessment before investing are still necessary.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-4745f9ce

· 2h ago

600 this position is indeed a bit interesting, but I think the Fibonacci set is more for entertainment; too many people using the same logic can easily lead to pitfalls. Frequent high activity from developers? That's what you should be most cautious about; retail investors are always the last to benefit. No matter how fancy the talk, you still need to study thoroughly yourself. Don't rely on any indicator to save you.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingersFOMO

· 5h ago

The 600 level is indeed interesting, but is Fibonacci really reliable? It feels like armchair analysis after the fact. Frequent high-volume trades sound a bit suspicious. Is the developer selling so aggressively for good reasons or is there another purpose? I've tried the 0.618 and 0.382 levels before, but looking back, it was just luck. Don't put too much faith in them. Placing risk warnings at the end seems a bit dismissive, but this area really needs to be taken seriously.

View OriginalReply0

DeFi_Dad_Jokes

· 5h ago

Position 600 is really a hurdle. The brothers who are skilled at Fibonacci have long been prepared. To put it simply, it's a probability game. 0.618 has worked before but has also failed, so don't be too superstitious about this method. Frequent high-volume operations? Sounds like you're harvesting leeks. Be careful, everyone. Technical analysis is indeed useful, but relying on a single indicator to rule them all? Wake up, the crypto market isn't that simple. Do your homework thoroughly. Don't risk your principal just to make a profit from price differences. It's not worth it.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityJanitor

· 5h ago

Position 600 is indeed a bit interesting, but I've always been skeptical about the Fibonacci set. If you could make money just by relying on 0.618, there wouldn't be any losses... It still depends on market sentiment. For projects that frequently operate with high amounts, I usually observe first; this kind of routine is too familiar. When truly making money, no one cares about the correction ratio; it's all about gut feeling and going for it. --- Developers do have many tricks, but be careful when the hype is high, brother. --- Thinking of jumping in at 600? It's still early, let's wait and see. --- Fibonacci is really useful, but the prerequisite is that you need to identify the correct trend direction. --- Those who talk about risk assessment haven't lost money before, huh. --- Technical analysis is just for fun; in the end, it still depends on luck and news.

View OriginalReply0

airdrop_huntress

· 5h ago

The critical level at 600 really can't hold anymore, a bunch of people are watching. Fibonacci is back again, will it work this time... Last time, following the 0.618 level directly led to a big loss. Developers really know how to play, making high-stakes moves every day, probably just trying to harvest the leeks. Technical indicators are all armchair generals; it's easy to talk, but when it comes to critical moments, no one can save you. The risk is high, but with this hype... you still have to go all in.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropJunkie

· 5h ago

600 won’t even dare to get in, what are you waiting for --- Fibonacci? I just watch the candlestick charts crash orders, what's wrong with that? --- Developers operating frequently sounds a bit suspicious... Is there risk prevention? --- Here comes the trick of playing with the golden ratio again, I got tired of this set last year --- Really, 0.618 can make money? Then why am I still losing? --- What about the other side of the coin, isn’t anyone mentioning it? --- Instead of studying Fibonacci, it’s better to see what developers are up to --- If technical analysis works, no one would get liquidated --- Price level data is ready, now just waiting for a dump

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysQuestioning

· 5h ago

Is 600 really that magical? Feels like armchair quarterbacking after the fact. I've listened to Fibonacci strategies a hundred times, but in the end, it still comes down to luck. Frequent high-stakes pushes? Be cautious, this trick feels a bit familiar. 0.618, 0.382—no matter how nice the numbers look, they can't stop a sell-off. No matter how scientific it sounds, in the end, it's all about gambling on luck. Technical analysis is just psychological comfort; if it really made money, no one would have to work. Boasting wildly, but in the end, it's best to assess risk—that's the real truth.

View OriginalReply0