2026-01-17 13:36:54

Many crypto projects are playing a common trick: boasting about their revenue capabilities. But what’s the result? Revenue data has become a legend, and no one can produce solid proof. It’s like an endless ghost story—well known by hearsay, but no one has seen the true form.

However, there are indeed anomalies. Some leading projects have annual recurring revenues exceeding $80M, derived from the genuine operations of over 200 ecosystem partners, with every dollar traceable. In comparison, projects that only boast seem like children who haven't been weaned yet.

How do these top projects actually make money? It’s rooted in their core business—creating stable cash flow through a network of partners, ecosystem protocols, transaction fees, and other channels. This isn’t a get-rich-quick scheme but genuine business operation. The gap is obvious when compared to knockoff projects that can’t even clarify their models.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ShitcoinArbitrageur

· 5h ago

To be honest, I've seen this routine too many times. Every day I hear about how much funding a certain project has raised, but when I check the ledger... there's nothing there.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 8h ago

You know, this circle is really like that. Most projects just hype themselves up, and the data is more and more outrageous. I don't believe it anymore. The projects that are truly making money have long been quietly earning profits; there's no need to shout about $80M revenue every day. The key is whether there is a real ecosystem backing it up—that's the real indicator. Many new projects haven't even figured out how to monetize yet, still talking about grand blueprints. Once you see through it, you'll realize that those projects with a network of partners are thriving, while others will eventually die. Having more partners naturally stabilizes cash flow, and that really is a true skill.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMisfit

· 8h ago

Damn, this is real deal, with a stable income of 80M that is traceable. It's far superior to those projects that shout YOLO calls every day.

View OriginalReply0

FantasyGuardian

· 8h ago

Projects with real strength don't need to boast at all; the data speaks for itself. $80M annual revenue can't be faked. --- It's the same old story, I've heard it for three years, and it's still the same projects talking nonsense. --- Honestly, there are very few projects that can build an ecosystem with over 200 partners; most are just air. --- In this day and age, projects with genuine cash flow are really scarce. No wonder everyone is chasing the top few. --- Rooted in core business—that's a good point. It's much more reliable than those projects that talk about vision every day. --- I just want to know how many projects still dare to publicly release financial reports these days. I bet not even ten can gather together. --- The cash flow generated by a network of partners is what makes it sustainable, unlike some projects that only cut the leeks.

View OriginalReply0

Rugpull幸存者

· 9h ago

Real data and scam coins can be distinguished at a glance. Unfortunately, most people are still being deceived by sweet talk. Large stable cash flow is true strength, not the fantasy of getting rich overnight. Once you see through these tricks, you'll know who is genuinely working and who is just blowing hot air. Projects with $80M annual revenue don't need to be promoted every day; the data speaks for itself. Ultimately, it still depends on whether there is a real ecosystem backing it; otherwise, it's all just stories.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiCaffeinator

· 9h ago

There are all kinds of hype projects everywhere, but truly cash-flowing ones are extremely rare, and those that can be verified by data are even more scarce. The gap is so huge you can't imagine, it's like comparing LV to street vendor goods. Those top projects with over $80M are doing what they should be doing; everything else is just wasting our time. Real operations are the hard currency; stop bragging about coins. A network of partners that supports the business is what truly matters, not gambling. I'm already tired of projects that can't clearly explain their business models, honestly it's so annoying. Stable cash flow > the dream of getting rich overnight; how many people truly understand this truth? Over 200 real data points from ecosystem partners are aligned; some projects have nowhere to hide. The gap between hype and real business is right there in front of us. Having seen through many project tricks, it's still disappointing to get scammed like this.

View OriginalReply0