2026-01-17 16:26:06

Recently observing the trend of BAGS, that feeling is really hard to describe. But then I saw someone analyze believe's trading logic, and I suddenly understood—believe's successful strategy at the time can be completely replicated on BAGS.

The key lies in the trading rhythm. believe's approach is to deliberately avoid the first wave of the market, and only deploy after there are genuine updates and continuous development signs from the official side, accumulating on dips along the way. This way, it avoids the risk traps of new tokens and can enjoy the upward trend validated by fundamentals. Applying the same logic to BAGS, it should also be able to follow a similar rhythm.

My personal energy is limited, mainly focusing on the operational ideas of these few projects, and not delving deeply into other tokens for now. But this coin selection mindset is indeed worth referencing.

BELIEVE-12,43%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

QuietlyStaking

· 42m ago

Believe it or not, I've already seen through that "believe" thing. Now you're trying to pump BAGS? It's a bit late, bro.

View OriginalReply0

BlockTalk

· 14h ago

To be honest, I saw through the believe scheme a long time ago. Now they're using it to trap BAGS? Haha, it depends on whether the official can really keep updating consistently. Missed the first wave and now want to buy the dip. I understand this mindset, but the risks are also high. Mainly, you need to have patience. For these few projects, I’m too lazy to bother with the others. Limited energy, after all.

View OriginalReply0

WalletAnxietyPatient

· 14h ago

Wait, can the believe setup be directly copied to BAGS? Why do I feel it's not that simple? BAGS's current pace feels different, the project team doesn't seem as active as believe. Buying on dips sounds good, but who can be sure where the bottom is, huh? I understand the logic, it's just that I'm worried BAGS can't replicate the same rhythm as believe. The strategy is the strategy, but look at what happened to those who believed in this kind of analysis last time.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropSweaterFan

· 14h ago

Believe it or not, I've seen through that whole belief system long ago, just waiting. Wait, can BAGS really be copied? Feels uncertain. The logic sounds good, but who dares to bet... Absorbing along the way sounds simple, but executing it is really a torment. Believe was indeed on point at the time, but whether BAGS can do the same is hard to say.

View OriginalReply0

rekt_but_resilient

· 14h ago

To be honest, the believe approach is indeed aggressive, but can BAGS be replicated? It still depends on whether the official support is strong enough. Buying on dips sounds simple, but when the price drops, a shaky hand can wipe everything out. That's how I am. Let's wait for the news on this wave, don't rush to go all-in.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityHunter

· 14h ago

Wait a minute, can the believe strategy really stack BAGS? Feels not that simple. --- Honestly, I don't have the courage to avoid the first wave haha. --- That logic sounds good, but the market is always changing, who knows. --- I understand that energy is limited, but it seems that those who really make money are all in on a certain project. --- Getting the rhythm right can indeed save a lot of trouble, but the premise is that you really understand this rhythm. --- To be honest, BAGS is still a bit uncertain right now. Let's wait for the official to release some solid proof. --- I didn't get in on that believe wave, now I kind of regret it haha. --- This waiting strategy sounds safe, but in practice, it can be mentally challenging.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 14h ago

Wait, can that whole believe thing really be replicated? It feels too idealistic.

View OriginalReply0