In the meme coin world, Solana and BSC have created an interesting seesaw effect between the two chains.



Careful observation reveals that when meme market activity on the SOL chain is hot, BSC often stalls or even weakens. Conversely, when SOL cools down, the same pattern occurs. Ultimately, this ebb and flow phenomenon is due to insufficient liquidity in the entire ecosystem, with funds repeatedly flowing between the two chains.

So, when trading, it might be helpful to observe in reverse—when SOL is surging, take a look to see if BSC has an opportunity; when BSC is rising, keep an eye on SOL's trend. If both chains show no obvious movement, then caution is advised, and you should be prepared to cut losses.

The differences between the chains are also quite interesting. Meme projects on SOL generally carry AI attributes and a sense of technology, while BSC's approach is more down-to-earth and accessible. In the future, these boundaries may blur, with project characteristics on both chains gradually infiltrating each other—AI projects need to learn storytelling, and more accessible projects should hide their sophistication deeper.

Following this logic to identify industry leaders might increase your success rate.
MEME-3,22%
SOL-1,2%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SilentObservervip
· 11h ago
This seesaw effect has been obvious for a long time; the key is how much you can earn by betting on the right direction. Liquidity is really a bottleneck; funds are limited, and the ebb and flow are very normal. The characteristics of the two chains will influence this judgment, which is pretty good, but talking about AI storytelling is easier said than done. SOL is a bit too hot right now; perhaps looking at BSC in reverse is the real opportunity. Stop loss if there's no performance; this advice is quite sharp. The leader should wait until liquidity is truly abundant before taking action.
View OriginalReply0
BetterLuckyThanSmartvip
· 13h ago
That's right, the funds are just that much, just flipping them back and forth.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithAPlanvip
· 13h ago
This seesaw effect is real, but I think it ultimately depends on who can tell a more compelling story first. Really, SOL has a bunch of flashy AI projects, while BSC is more down-to-earth and easier to produce a dark horse. Neither is moving? Then it really needs to be withdrawn; this signal is too dangerous. However, finding a leader is not that easy, and there's still a lot of luck involved.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMistakervip
· 13h ago
Wow, the seesaw effect really makes sense now. With the two-way arbitrage mechanism, the funds are limited, just cycle back and forth.
View OriginalReply0
governance_lurkervip
· 13h ago
Wow, this seesaw is really amazing, I feel like I've been constantly being cut.
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeafvip
· 14h ago
Wow, this seesaw effect is spot on. I really hadn't thought about it this way before.
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignStevevip
· 14h ago
Bro, this seesaw theory is really awesome. I've done it this way, made money and lost money. Really, liquidity is limited. Who wins and who loses all depends on where the funds flow. BSC has always been underestimated. Just thinking about SOL's madness is a mistake.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)