Source: CryptoNewsNet
Original Title: Matthew Sigel Corrects New York Times: VanEck Is Bullish on MSTR, Increases Strategy Holdings
Original Link:
Matthew Sigel, the head of digital asset research at VanEck pushed back on a New York Times report about Strategy (MSTR). He said the article mischaracterized CEO Jan van Eck’s comments and left readers with a false impression about VanEck’s stance on Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkTongue
· 3h ago
NYT is writing nonsense again? Vaneek is clearly increasing their position in MSTR, but these reporters are deliberately twisting it around. LOL
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 3h ago
The New York Times is stirring things up again; VanEck's response this time is really good.
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollector
· 3h ago
NYT causing trouble again? Even after VanEck officially clarified, they keep reporting falsely... MSTR has indeed been underestimated this time.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSunriser
· 3h ago
NYT is causing trouble again. Vaneck's clarification this time was timely. MSTR has indeed been heavily criticized.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezer
· 3h ago
NYT has been proven wrong again, supporting MSTR is not as simple as it seems.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrain
· 3h ago
NYT has been proven wrong again, MSTR this move definitely has a chance.
Matthew Sigel Corrects New York Times: VanEck Is Bullish on MSTR, Increases Strategy Holdings
Source: CryptoNewsNet Original Title: Matthew Sigel Corrects New York Times: VanEck Is Bullish on MSTR, Increases Strategy Holdings Original Link: Matthew Sigel, the head of digital asset research at VanEck pushed back on a New York Times report about Strategy (MSTR). He said the article mischaracterized CEO Jan van Eck’s comments and left readers with a false impression about VanEck’s stance on Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model.