Stories on Polymarket have always involved two types of people. Most are betting there, essentially gambling—guessing whether a certain event will happen or not. But one player used a different approach, turning $60 into $150,000.
What's the difference? Just watch how he operates.
Those people spend all day arguing on social platforms, debating YES or NO, claiming to have insider information or that they've bet on the right side. It's all prediction. But this guy isn't that complicated—he doesn't predict at all.
His method is simple: bet on both sides simultaneously. Buy both YES and NO. Let market fluctuations work for him. When prices move, the gains from one position are enough to cover the losses on the other, plus a profit. This is arbitrage logic, not gambling.
The data speaks: a 96% success rate. This isn't achieved through prediction; it's mathematics. When you don't rely on judging the event itself but depend on the regularity of price fluctuations, your win rate naturally increases.
In prediction markets like Polymarket, volatility itself is an opportunity. The key is how you leverage it.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoCrazyGF
· 15h ago
This arbitrage idea is brilliant; finally, someone has clearly explained the difference between gambling and arbitrage.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpster
· 15h ago
Damn, this is exactly what I've been wanting to say—gambling and arbitrage are just a thin layer of paper apart.
Alright, going from 60 to 150,000 is indeed outrageous, but do we have to copy that logic?
Volatility is an opportunity, that's true, but the key is having the capital to wait.
You guys are still arguing about YES or NO, I've already bought both sides haha.
Math really doesn't lie, but it's not that simple to operate.
This guy found the idea of "not betting on the event itself," in other words, feeling like a bookmaker.
By the way, that 96% success rate... is it real?
Once arbitrage is exposed, there's no chance. Who are they trying to cut out now by revealing this?
View OriginalReply0
RugPullSurvivor
· 15h ago
Damn, this is the real gameplay. My friends were still betting on Polymarket, and I was laughing my ass off.
I knew about the dual-position opening trick a long time ago, but I never thought it could achieve a 96% success rate. This guy really gets it.
Basically, it's not about betting on the outcome, but on the volatility. Math > prediction. There's nothing wrong with this logic.
From 60 bucks to 150,000. If that's true, I would go all in directly, but it's still a bit risky.
Wait, does this logic work on other exchanges? Or is Polymarket's liquidity particularly suitable?
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzler
· 15h ago
Wow, this is arbitrage! Finally someone explained it thoroughly. Why didn't I think of this before?
View OriginalReply0
Whale_Whisperer
· 15h ago
Wow, someone finally explained arbitrage clearly
Basically, it's about profiting from price fluctuations, much more reliable than those who boast about their predictions every day
A 96% success rate is truly impressive; math never lies
Why didn't I think of betting on both sides at the same time earlier...
This is the real alpha strategy, not gambling
View OriginalReply0
HashRatePhilosopher
· 16h ago
Damn, this is the right way. No wonder others are making money while we're still guessing ups and downs.
Buy on both sides? Sounds simple, but this arbitrage idea is really brilliant. Not having to predict actually increases the win rate.
A 96% success rate totally blew my mind. How do those guys on social media who just talk trash see this?
Arbitrage is more exciting than gambling. Let the market do the work for you—that's a brilliant approach.
I'm really envious of the mindset that can go from $60 to $150,000. I need to study this logic carefully.
Remember, volatility = opportunity. I had the wrong idea before.
So this is the trick. It's not about right or wrong, but how to use math to profit from fluctuations.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 16h ago
This is the correct way to play prediction markets, not just relying on trash talk and bravado.
From 60 to 150,000, it's that simple when laid out clearly—arbitrage is the key.
Wait, does that 96% success rate also depend on the specific price difference window...
That's right, most people are just gambling; those who truly make money already know how to profit from volatility.
Why the hell didn't I think of this from the start—going long and short simultaneously to profit from the spread...
This tactic is actually old news in the crypto circle, but few can really execute it.
Price volatility itself is the alpha; enlightenment strikes.
Stories on Polymarket have always involved two types of people. Most are betting there, essentially gambling—guessing whether a certain event will happen or not. But one player used a different approach, turning $60 into $150,000.
What's the difference? Just watch how he operates.
Those people spend all day arguing on social platforms, debating YES or NO, claiming to have insider information or that they've bet on the right side. It's all prediction. But this guy isn't that complicated—he doesn't predict at all.
His method is simple: bet on both sides simultaneously. Buy both YES and NO. Let market fluctuations work for him. When prices move, the gains from one position are enough to cover the losses on the other, plus a profit. This is arbitrage logic, not gambling.
The data speaks: a 96% success rate. This isn't achieved through prediction; it's mathematics. When you don't rely on judging the event itself but depend on the regularity of price fluctuations, your win rate naturally increases.
In prediction markets like Polymarket, volatility itself is an opportunity. The key is how you leverage it.