The two major mainstream Launchpad platforms are vying for market attention, with BAGS and Pump platforms engaging in a tug-of-war, and the competition is fierce. Notably, in such a competitive environment, the platforms can still maintain a 2% two-way fee structure, reflecting strong market demand for this type of service. When traders choose a platform, besides considering trading volume performance, the fee structure is also worth calculating—after all, trading costs directly impact returns.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Fren_Not_Food
· 10h ago
2% fee really can't hold up anymore. These two platforms are probably trying to outcompete each other to death, right?
View OriginalReply0
Tokenomics911
· 10h ago
A 2% fee is really acceptable, but the key is that liquidity must keep up; otherwise, even if it's cheaper, it's useless.
View OriginalReply0
PositionPhobia
· 10h ago
A 2% fee can still be sustained, indicating there is indeed demand, but I am more concerned about which platform actually processes withdrawals faster.
View OriginalReply0
NoodlesOrTokens
· 10h ago
Is a 2% fee really okay? It seems some platforms have lower fees.
The two major mainstream Launchpad platforms are vying for market attention, with BAGS and Pump platforms engaging in a tug-of-war, and the competition is fierce. Notably, in such a competitive environment, the platforms can still maintain a 2% two-way fee structure, reflecting strong market demand for this type of service. When traders choose a platform, besides considering trading volume performance, the fee structure is also worth calculating—after all, trading costs directly impact returns.