Recently observing the AI market trend, the losses are actually not too bad. Upon closer inspection, this round of rally lacks genuine Ponzi-driven momentum and there is no strong flywheel effect to sustain the heat, which has led to a clear lack of sustained strength.
Let's wait and see what happens next. If a second wave really comes, it is highly likely that it is the result of a leading stock consolidating at the bottom zone and accumulating shares over a long period. When it rises again, it will just be a technical rebound. Instead of rushing to chase, it's better to patiently wait for the leader to signal— the longer the consolidation and the more thorough the accumulation, the stronger the rebound will be.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WealthCoffee
· 5h ago
Basically, no one is willing to take over. Let's wait until the leading players are fully saturated before making a move.
View OriginalReply0
MevHunter
· 5h ago
No real flywheel, just hard pulling, no wonder there's no endurance
I've heard this sideways accumulation pattern too many times, and it's probably a signal for chopping leeks again
Let's wait and see, anyway I can't lose much anymore haha
Leading indicator? Feels like we're always waiting for the leader to give a signal…
Instead of staring at the rebound, it's better to look for new growth points
This logic sounds good, but it's easy to end up as a leek
Lack of sustainability basically means no one is willing to take the buy-in
View OriginalReply0
SolidityJester
· 5h ago
Accumulating sideways has been talked about too much; the key is when the leader will move.
Wait, is there really no flywheel effect this round? Why do I feel like we're still messing around?
Rather than waiting for signals, it's better to watch the market yourself—it's too tiring.
The logic of building a foundation is solid, but the question is whether it can hold until then.
Is the rebound strength strong? Let's see if it can rebound first before talking.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuyer
· 5h ago
Basically, there's no real cash backing, and this rebound is very fake.
The routine of accumulating at the bottom is old news, but it is indeed the case.
Reliable leaders haven't given any signals yet, so I'll just stay on the sidelines.
Those chasing the high will have trouble; let's wait and see who can absorb the most.
View OriginalReply0
PonziWhisperer
· 6h ago
Without a Ponzi scheme drive, there's no wave. This round is indeed虚
Wait, just横盘吸筹 is useless, the key is who is dumping
This time is different, no one dares to move before the leader shows signs
Basically, it's waiting for a signal to cut the韭菜, right?
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageur
· 6h ago
actually checked the order book depth on this ai rally and the lack of real accumulation pattern is... predictable. classic retail fomo without any structural support underneath
Recently observing the AI market trend, the losses are actually not too bad. Upon closer inspection, this round of rally lacks genuine Ponzi-driven momentum and there is no strong flywheel effect to sustain the heat, which has led to a clear lack of sustained strength.
Let's wait and see what happens next. If a second wave really comes, it is highly likely that it is the result of a leading stock consolidating at the bottom zone and accumulating shares over a long period. When it rises again, it will just be a technical rebound. Instead of rushing to chase, it's better to patiently wait for the leader to signal— the longer the consolidation and the more thorough the accumulation, the stronger the rebound will be.