2026-01-18 07:24:52

Recently, there have been reports that the globally renowned financial infrastructure company DTCC has made new statements regarding the promotion of tokenized securities projects. Nadine Chakar, Head of Digital Assets at DTCC, emphasized that DTCC remains open to iterations of the tokenized securities solution, but also clearly pointed out that risk management and data standards are unavoidable core issues.

It is worth noting that DTCC particularly emphasized the importance of interoperability. In their view, a truly mature digital asset ecosystem should not be constrained by technical architecture — whether it involves different blockchain networks, assets should be able to flow seamlessly. This approach reflects the industry's urgent need to break the "chain-to-chain island" phenomenon.

As more financial institutions enter the tokenization track, how to achieve cross-chain collaboration while ensuring security is gradually becoming a key issue for the entire ecosystem's smooth upgrade.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenToaster

· 15h ago

DTCC is really coming now; interoperability needs to be properly handled.

View OriginalReply0

Ser_Liquidated

· 01-18 07:54

In simple terms, DTCC is only now realizing the importance of interoperability, which is a bit late. --- Cross-chain collaboration sounds easy, but in reality, various risk management issues become the bottleneck. --- Risk management definitely needs attention, but don't make it too complicated, or it'll just turn into a bunch of compliance nonsense. --- DTCC's attitude this time is considered an improvement, definitely better than the previous dismissive attitude towards tokenization. --- Breaking down silos through interoperability is the right direction, but I'm worried it might just become another set of centralized barriers. --- The real situation is that once financial institutions get involved, someone has to be responsible for the backing, so these standards will always be unavoidable. --- It sounds grand, but in practice, we're still waiting for the technology to mature gradually.

View OriginalReply0

RektCoaster

· 01-18 07:49

Basically, they just want to unify standards, but is it really that simple? --- Interoperability and seamless flow sound great, but how does it actually work in practice? --- DTCC finally remembers to take control of this mess. --- If you can't pass the risk management check, don't talk about having an open mindset. --- Cross-chain collaboration, every time I hear it, I feel it's still a long way off. --- The real question is who will set the data standards—that's the true power struggle. --- All the institutions came in, and it only got more chaotic. I just want to see who can survive in the end. --- The phenomenon of chain-to-chain islands has been talked about for so long, but it still hasn't been solved—it's truly funny. --- As long as risk control is deadlocked, all interoperability efforts are pointless.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropSkeptic

· 01-18 07:43

Basically, DTCC is still leaving itself an escape route. An open-minded attitude sounds good, but how many people will be overwhelmed by the risk management hurdle?

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxOpener

· 01-18 07:34

Cross-chain interoperability is indeed a valid point, but the reality is that everyone wants to build their own ecosystem. Who is truly willing to open up?

View OriginalReply0

SerRugResistant

· 01-18 07:25

DTCC finally said something sensible... Interoperability is indeed unavoidable; otherwise, each one building their own doesn't make sense.

View OriginalReply0