2026-01-18 07:25:15

There is a very ironic contradiction in this industry: we constantly talk about decentralized applications, and smart contracts indeed run on-chain, but what about the front-end interface that users access? Nine times out of ten, it's still hosted on centralized servers like Vercel, AWS, or similar. In plain terms, with a regulatory notice or a service provider’s ban, your DApp can become an isolated code that ordinary users cannot access.

Walrus Sites was created to break this deadlock. It’s not just about storage; it aims to fundamentally transform the outdated concept of "servers."

The underlying technical logic is actually quite solid. In Walrus’s architecture, those HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files are no longer static on a hard drive in a data center. Instead, they are sliced into countless Blob fragments and dispersed across a global network of nodes. These fragments are organized and indexed using Sui’s object model.

When you open a website deployed on Walrus, your browser isn’t communicating with a central server. Instead, it interacts directly with this decentralized network. Your local Service Worker or public portal (Portal) fetches these fragments in real-time from the network, piecing them together and rendering the complete page directly in your browser.

What’s the result? As long as the blockchain continues to produce blocks normally, your website remains accessible forever. No central service provider, no single point of failure, and no risk of unwarranted shutdown. This is true decentralized application in the real sense. From a technical perspective, this isn’t just an upgrade; it’s a deep transformation of the entire Web architecture.

SUI-1,06%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Liquidated_Larry

· 4h ago

Really? Has Walrus finally figured out the frontend issue this time? I've complained countless times about those DApps running on-chain but dying on Vercel, and now someone is finally taking it seriously. Honestly, I need to think more about this idea of fragmenting the Blob; it sounds promising. But words are meaningless; only if this thing runs stably can it count. It's too early to boast now. If Walrus's architecture really works, then those centralized parents at AWS might not be able to sit still. Interesting. But on the other hand, a website that never goes offline on-chain—that sounds great, but who can guarantee it? Is decentralized frontend really coming? But I just want to ask, who will maintain these fragments? Finally, someone pointed out the stupidest contradiction: bragging about decentralization every day, but the frontend is hosted on American servers. That's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdvice

· 9h ago

Damn, finally someone pointed out this cancerous issue. Honestly, it's a big joke. The idea behind Walrus is indeed ruthless—completely breaking down and reassembling the frontend. That's true decentralization. The moment the frontend gets eliminated, I knew Web3 was long overdue for such a day. Wait, is the Blob fragment system really capable of preventing censorship, or is it just another new concept hype? Alright, at least it's much better than the current group of pseudo DApps. That's pretty intense. The era of servers really should come to an end. Bro, your article is so heartfelt, it hits the nail on the head.

View OriginalReply0

rugdoc.eth

· 9h ago

Now I finally understand what true decentralization is. Those previous attempts were just half-hearted efforts. Speaking of Walrus, this idea is really bold—directly cutting off centralized service providers. Blob fragments are distributed to global nodes. Isn't this the real redundancy backup? Finally, someone is seriously solving this problem. But there's still a question: can ordinary users afford it? What about the costs? This should be able to shut up those who say "DApps are actually very centralized." Wait, what if the chain stops... but it's definitely more reliable than AWS. Really? Can Walrus actually deliver such a smooth experience, or is it just perfect in theory but lacking in practice? I think this is the true killer app for Sui. The move to overhaul the storage layer was brilliantly executed. I’ve used those so-called decentralized frontends before, and the experience was terrible. Hope Walrus doesn’t repeat the same mistakes. Contracts run on-chain but frontends are centralized—it's really ironic. Looks like this industry still has a lot to endure. Will Gateway Portal eventually evolve into a new single point of bottleneck? Not entirely sure.

View OriginalReply0

retroactive_airdrop

· 9h ago

Someone finally hit the nail on the head. It's indeed outrageous that the front end is locked down. I'm interested in the Walrus approach. Fragmented and decentralized storage sounds like true decentralization. Vercel's system will eventually be replaced; once regulation comes, everything is gone. However, how stable is the Blob fragment stitching scheme? Will there be rendering delays? The outdated server concept is well said. Let's see who can truly make it work. As long as the chain is alive, the website is alive. I buy into this logic. It feels like another impressive-sounding plan that might encounter pitfalls when actually used. Web3 has been talking about decentralization, but the infrastructure is still that old set of tools. If Walrus can really work this time, it would indeed be a paradigm shift.

View OriginalReply0

BitcoinDaddy

· 9h ago

Amazing, finally someone has exposed the emperor's new clothes --- Vercel and AWS are the glass ceilings of the DeFi world, the promised decentralization has been cut in half --- Now the front end is truly "chain-ified," servers should retire --- Wait, Blob fragments scattered across global nodes... is this technical approach serious? It feels a bit intense --- It sounds good, but the key is whether the ecosystem can keep up, or it will just become another dust in the tech solution library --- As long as the blockchain produces blocks, it will never crash. I love hearing that, but whether reality will be this ideal is hard to say --- Finally no more being bottlenecked by centralized platforms, no more fearing that a single CEO's words could take down the website --- The name Walrus is well-chosen, it makes me think of a solution to the elephant in the room --- Having the front end truly run on-chain is no longer just DeFi optimization; it's a fundamental revolution in Web architecture --- Here's the problem: will ordinary developers find it super complicated to use, or will they fall into another learning curve trap

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityNinja

· 9h ago

Damn, someone finally pointed out this bug. The front end is still on a centralized server, so claiming decentralization is just ridiculous. Walrus's approach is indeed bold—completely eliminating the concept of servers. Blob fragments are distributed to global nodes. Whether this can truly resist censorship depends on how the subsequent ecosystem develops. But to be honest, if we want to achieve full decentralization, how do we ensure user experience? I still have some doubts. If this gets running, the folks at Vercel will panic. Wait, could the Portal mechanism also become a new single point of failure? Alright, at least the direction is correct—much better than those pseudo-decentralization projects. Finally, I see projects genuinely trying to solve this pain point, not just blowing hot air about concepts.

View OriginalReply0