2026-01-18 07:30:07

Many people still say that SHIB is an air coin, but this judgment is already falling behind the project's pace. Based on recent developments, several noteworthy changes are taking place.

First is the actual advancement of the burn mechanism. In the past 7 days, 1.938 trillion SHIB have been burned, and the Dynamic Burn 2.0 has also been launched. This is not just a numbers game; it is genuinely changing the token's supply. Compared to some projects that only talk but do not act, this continuous deflationary mechanism is indeed increasing scarcity.

There are also concrete progress in application deployment. The cooperation with the UAE government has opened up real use cases, and PayPal's payment integration has expanded the usage scope to a broader user base. These are not concepts but actual ecosystem expansion.

In terms of community governance, the DAO co-governance model gives token holders real voting rights. Compared to some projects where only the development team makes decisions, this approach is indeed a step further.

In the short term, opportunities for high sell and low buy can be observed in the range of 0.0000175-0.0000180. But more importantly, it’s better to look at the bigger picture with a longer-term perspective.

SHIB-3,59%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVHunterLucky

· 16h ago

Burning digital tokens sounds good, but can it really boost the market? I think it mainly depends on the actual usage volume on PayPal's side. Not denying there has been progress, but the "air coin" label isn't something that can be removed with just one or two partnerships. DAO governance sounds very democratic, but in reality, it still depends on how major stakeholders vote. I've already been accumulating during that short-term range, but for the long term... I'll wait until I make some money first. The launch of Destroy 2.0 is indeed a signal, much better than projects that just hype concepts. By the way, has the collaboration with the UAE actually materialized? Or is it just talk again? I'm optimistic, but risk awareness is still necessary. Don't get caught off guard and not even know why.

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 01-18 08:00

ngl the burn mechanics sound solid but have you calculated what those bridge fees cost to actually move shib across networks... 1.938T tokens sounds great until you realize the gwei during that window probably ate half the gains lol

Reply0

GasWaster

· 01-18 07:59

No hype, no negativity. The destruction data is right there. This round is indeed a bit different. PayPal is already on board, and you're still calling it a scam coin? Come on, wake up. I have to say, DAO governance is impressive. Compared to some projects, it's truly sincere. 0.0000175 seems to be a sweet spot. I'm waiting. Can this round break out? Watching closely. Why haven't I seen any discussions about the launch of Destruction 2.0? Feels like the buzz is a bit lacking.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 01-18 07:56

Burning data looks good, but there are very few projects that can truly be implemented. Don't just look at the numbers; it might just be a show. Is PayPal reliable? What happened to those previously partnered projects? It all feels like a well-told story. DAO governance sounds advanced, but in reality, the decision-making power is still in the hands of a few people. I've seen this trick many times. In the short term, within the 0.000017 range, check if there is real trading volume support before bottom fishing.

View OriginalReply0

LayerHopper

· 01-18 07:46

Destroying 19.38 trillion sounds great, but can it really change fate? Or is it just the old saying—only applications have a future. PayPal's move is indeed well-executed; it's much more reliable than just promises on paper. I have reservations about DAO governance; ultimately, it's still the big players who call the shots. It seems like recent meme coins have all learned to tell stories haha. I'm waiting in the 0.0000175 range; just don't panic and dump the market.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-18 07:45

Destroying data looks good, but I'm worried it might just be the prelude to another round of rug pulling. However, the PayPal part is somewhat interesting. Putting aside the quick money mentality, this DAO model is indeed much more transparent than some projects. Looking at the destruction mechanism alone is useless; the key is whether the subsequent ecosystem can really take off. Is the cooperation with the UAE reliable? Or is it just another wave of hype? I'm a bit unsure. Wait, did PayPal really integrate? If it really happens, then it's worth paying attention to. Anyway, I don't believe in short-term fluctuations; the long-term is what matters.

View OriginalReply0

MelonField

· 01-18 07:36

Destroying 19.38 trillion sounds impressive, but actual implementation is the real key. PayPal payments are indeed interesting, but it still depends on actual usage. I've heard the DAO governance explanation many times, but the key is whether anyone is truly committed to participating. Around 0.0000175, it's worth a shot, but don't go all in. Shiba has never been purely hype; just hope it doesn't keep delaying again. The cooperation with the UAE depends on how reliable it is; avoid another PPT fundraising. Long-term holders have already made profits; I just want to understand when I can break even.

View OriginalReply0